CVE-2026-21908
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Use After Free vulnerability was identified in the 802.1X authentication daemon (dot1xd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved that could allow an authenticated, network-adjacent attacker flapping a port to crash the dot1xd process, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS), or potentially execute arbitrary code within the context of the process running as root. The issue is specific to the processing of a change in authorization (CoA) when a port bounce occurs. A pointer is freed but was then referenced later in the same code path. Successful exploitation is outside the attacker's direct control due to the specific timing of the two events required to execute the vulnerable code path. This issue affects systems with 802.1X authentication port-based network access control (PNAC) enabled. This issue affects: Junos OS: * from 23.2R2-S1 before 23.2R2-S5, * from 23.4R2 before 23.4R2-S6, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-S3, * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-S1, * from 25.2 before 25.2R1-S2, 25.2R2; Junos OS Evolved: * from 23.2R2-S1 before 23.2R2-S5-EVO, * from 23.4R2 before 23.4R2-S6-EVO, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-S3-EVO, * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-S1-EVO, * from 25.2 before 25.2R1-S2-EVO, 25.2R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUse After Free vulnerability in Juniper's 802.1X authentication daemon (dot1xd) where a pointer is freed but still referenced during Change of Authorization (CoA) processing when a port bounce occurs. An authenticated network-adjacent attacker can trigger port flapping to crash the dot1xd process (DoS) or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution as root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos versionRun `show version` on the device CLI to obtain the installed Junos version.Affected if The version matches 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2 base releases before patches are applied.
-
Confirm 802.1X is enabledRun `show dot1x summary` or check the configuration with `show configuration protocols dot1x` to see if 802.1X (PNAC) is configured on any interfaces.Affected if 802.1X authentication is enabled on one or more interfaces (the dot1xd daemon is active).
-
Verify dot1xd process is runningRun `show system processes dot1xd` or `request system process daemon dot1xd status` to confirm the dot1xd daemon is running.Affected if The dot1xd process is active and running on the device.
-
Check for Change of Authorization (CoA) configurationReview the RADIUS server configuration with `show configuration access` to see if CoA is configured, as the vulnerability triggers during CoA processing.Affected if CoA messages are accepted from a RADIUS server (this is the condition where the UAF triggers during port bounce).
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos base version (23.2/23.4/24.2/24.4/25.2), has 802.1X enabled on any ports, and the dot1xd daemon is running to process authentication requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable 802.1X (PNAC) on all ports if not required, or apply Juniper's vendor patches (upgrade to fixed versions: 23.2R2-S5, 23.4R2-S6, 24.2R2-S3, 24.4R2-S1, 25.2R1-S2, or 25.2R2 and later).
Upgrade to the fixed S-release or R2-release for your version branch (e.g., 23.2R2-S5, 23.4R2-S6, 24.2R2-S3, 24.4R2-S1, or 25.2R2)
- 1. Identify the currently running Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which version branch you're on (23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2)
- 3. If running an affected version, plan an upgrade to the appropriate fixed release for your branch
- 4. For Junos OS 23.2.x: upgrade to 23.2R2-S5 or later
- 5. For Junos OS 23.4.x: upgrade to 23.4R2-S6 or later
- 6. For Junos OS 24.2.x: upgrade to 24.2R2-S3 or later
- 7. For Junos OS 24.4.x: upgrade to 24.4R2-S1 or later
- 8. For Junos OS 25.2.x: upgrade to 25.2R1-S2 or 25.2R2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21908 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data