CVE-2026-21914
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Locking vulnerability in the GTP plugin of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (Dos). If an SRX Series device receives a specifically malformed GPRS Tunnelling Protocol (GTP) Modify Bearer Request message, a lock is acquired and never released. This results in other threads not being able to acquire a lock themselves, causing a watchdog timeout leading to FPC crash and restart. This issue leads to a complete traffic outage until the device has automatically recovered. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * all versions before 22.4R3-S8, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S5, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S6, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S3, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S2, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R1-S1, 25.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition or improper lock handling in the GTP plugin causes a deadlock when a malformed GTP Modify Bearer Request is received. The lock is acquired but never released, blocking other threads from acquiring the same lock, triggering a watchdog timeout that crashes and restarts the FPC (Flow Processing Card), causing complete traffic outage until auto-recovery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.4= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the Junos OS version number (e.g., 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2)Affected if The installed version is any of: < 22.4, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2 (versions not equal to the fixed releases: 22.4R3-S8, 23.2R2-S5, 23.4R2-S6, 24.2R2-S3, 24.4R2-S2, 25.2R1-S1, or 25.2R2)
-
Verify GTP service is enabledRun 'show services gtps statistics' or check configuration with 'show configuration | match gtp' to see if GTP service is configured and activeAffected if GTP service is enabled and the device is processing GTP traffic (the flaw requires GTP to be running)
-
Check for FPC crash or restart logsRun 'show log messages' and search for patterns like 'FPC.*crash', 'watchdog timeout', 'FPC.*restart', or 'GTP' related errors using '| match' filtersAffected if Recent FPC crashes, watchdog timeouts, or GTP plugin errors appear in the system logs (indicating the deadlock may have already been triggered)
-
Check FPC status and healthRun 'show chassis fpc' to view the status of Flow Processing Cards and look for any FPCs in 'Online' but unstable state, or check 'show system core-dumps' for recent core filesAffected if FPC shows unexpected restarts, offline status, or core dump files exist from recent crashes
You are affected if GTP service is enabled AND your Junos version falls within the affected list (< 22.4, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2) and you have not applied one of the fixed subversions or later releases.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.4
Upgrade Junos OS on SRX Series to the fixed versions (22.4R3-S8, 23.2R2-S5, 23.4R2-S6, 24.2R2-S3, 24.4R2-S2, 25.2R1-S1, or 25.2R2 or later) to patch the improper locking vulnerability in the GTP plugin.
22.4R3-S8, 23.2R2-S5, 23.4R2-S6, 24.2R2-S3, 24.4R2-S2, or 25.2R2 (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the SRX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which version branch your device is running (22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2)
- 3. For 22.4 branch: upgrade to 22.4R3-S8 or later
- 4. For 23.2 branch: upgrade to 23.2R2-S5 or later
- 5. For 23.4 branch: upgrade to 23.4R2-S6 or later
- 6. For 24.2 branch: upgrade to 24.2R2-S3 or later
- 7. For 24.4 branch: upgrade to 24.4R2-S2 or later
- 8. For 25.2 branch: upgrade to 25.2R1-S1 or 25.2R2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21914 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21914 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data