CVE-2026-21918
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Double Free vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX and MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). On all SRX and MX Series platforms, when during TCP session establishment a specific sequence of packets is encountered a double free happens. This causes flowd to crash and the respective FPC to restart. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX and MX Series: * all versions before 22.4R3-S7, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA double free vulnerability exists in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX and MX Series platforms. When a specific packet sequence is encountered during TCP session establishment, the flowd process experiences a double free condition, causing it to crash and triggering a restart of the Flexible PIC Concentrator (FPC). An unauthenticated, network-based attacker can exploit this to cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.4= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify platform typeExecute 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' and confirm the device is an SRX Series or MX Series routerAffected if Device is not SRX or MX Series (vulnerability only affects these platforms)
-
Check installed Junos versionRun 'show version' and note the Junos OS version string (e.g., 22.4R1, 23.2R1, etc.)Affected if Version is < 22.4, or equals 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Verify flowd is runningRun 'show system processes' or 'show system processes extensive' and confirm the flowd (flow-processing-daemon) process is activeAffected if flowd is not running (vulnerability only applies when flowd is enabled)
-
Check for recent FPC restarts or flowd crashesRun 'show log messages' and search for 'FPC' restart events or 'flowd' crash indicators using 'grep -i fpc' or 'grep -i flowd'Affected if Recent FPC restarts or flowd core dumps are present in logs
User is affected if running Junos version 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2 (or any version below 22.4) on an SRX or MX Series device with flowd enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.4
Apply the vendor-supplied Junos OS updates: upgrade to 22.4R3-S7, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S4, or 24.2R2 or later. For systems that cannot be immediately updated, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted TCP traffic.
Upgrade to 22.4R3-S7 or later, 23.2R2-S3 or later, 23.4R2-S4 or later, or 24.2R2 or later depending on the version branch
- Identify the current Junos OS version on the SRX/MX device using 'show version'
- Determine which version branch (22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2) the device is running
- Plan a maintenance window as the upgrade will require a reboot
- Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version: 22.4R3-S7 or later (22.4 branch), 23.2R2-S3 or later (23.2 branch), 23.4R2-S4 or later (23.4 branch), or 24.2R2 or later (24.2 branch) from the Juniper support portal
- Transfer the Junos OS upgrade image to the device using SCP or USB
- Initiate the upgrade using 'request system software add <image> reboot' command
- After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
- Confirm flowd is running properly with 'show system processes' or similar process check
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,608.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21918 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21918 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data