CVE-2026-21944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Oracle Agile PLM for Process (Product Quality Management component version 6.2.4) allows low-privileged attackers with network access via HTTP to read sensitive data due to insufficient authorization checks. The CVSS vector indicates a confidentiality-only impact with high data exposure but no integrity or availability compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Oracle Agile PLM for Process is installedLocate the installation directory or check system inventory for 'Oracle Agile PLM for Process' or 'Agile Process' software. On Windows, check Add/Remove Programs. On Linux, check installed packages or application directories.Affected if The software is present on the system
-
Verify the exact version is 6.2.4Check the version of Oracle Agile PLM for Process. This can typically be found in the application's About section, in the installation directory's version file, or via the application's help > about menu. Common paths include the /bin or /version directories within the Oracle Agile installation.Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.2.4
-
Confirm Product Quality Management module is accessibleLog into the Oracle Agile PLM for Process web interface and navigate to check if the Product Quality Management module is available. This is typically accessed through the application's main menu or module selection screen.Affected if The Product Quality Management module is present and accessible to the user account being tested
-
Verify HTTP network accessibilityConfirm the application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS by attempting to reach the application's web URL. Check if the application's HTTP endpoint is exposed on the network.Affected if The application is reachable via network HTTP/HTTPS access
-
Test low-privilege user access to sensitive dataUsing a low-privileged user account (non-admin), attempt to access data within the Product Quality Management module that should normally be restricted. Observe if unauthorized data is returned or accessible.Affected if A low-privileged user can read sensitive data they should not have access to within the Product Quality Management module
The environment is affected if Oracle Agile PLM for Process version 6.2.4 is installed with the Product Quality Management module accessible over HTTP, and low-privileged users can read restricted data due to insufficient authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle's security patches for this vulnerability and review/limit user permissions in the Product Quality Management module to enforce proper authorization controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data