CVE-2026-22030
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedReact Router is a router for React. In @remix-run/server-runtime version prior to 2.17.3. and react-router 7.0.0 through 7.11.0, React Router (or Remix v2) is vulnerable to CSRF attacks on document POST requests to UI routes when using server-side route action handlers in Framework Mode, or when using React Server Actions in the new unstable RSC modes. There is no impact if Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>) is being used. This issue has been patched in @remix-run/server-runtime version 2.17.3 and react-router version 7.12.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReact Router versions prior to 2.17.3 (and react-router 7.0.0-7.11.0) are vulnerable to CSRF attacks on document POST requests to UI routes when using server-side route action handlers in Framework Mode or React Server Actions in unstable RSC modes. The vulnerability does not impact Declarative Mode or Data Mode configurations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, <= 7.11.0< 2.17.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check react-router version in package.jsonInspect your package.json file and locate the react-router dependency. Note the installed version number.Affected if The version is 7.0.0 through 7.11.0 (inclusive)
-
Check @remix-run/server-runtime version in package.jsonInspect your package.json file and locate the @remix-run/server-runtime dependency. Note the installed version number.Affected if The version is below 2.17.3
-
Identify if Framework Mode is in useReview your React Router v7 configuration files and runtime setup to determine whether the application is running in Framework Mode.Affected if Framework Mode is enabled AND the react-router version is affected (7.0.0-7.11.0)
-
Identify if React Server Actions in unstable RSC modes are in useReview your application code and configuration to determine whether React Server Actions are being used in unstable RSC (React Server Components) modes.Affected if React Server Actions in unstable RSC modes are enabled AND the react-router or @remix-run/server-runtime version is affected
-
Confirm configuration mode is Declarative or Data ModeReview your application configuration to identify which mode is active: Declarative Mode, Data Mode, or Framework Mode.Affected if The application is NOT using Declarative Mode or Data Mode (meaning it is using the affected Framework Mode or unstable RSC)
-
Determine if server-side route action handlers are in useInspect your route handler code to identify if document POST requests are being processed through server-side route action handlers.Affected if Server-side route action handlers are processing POST requests to UI routes AND the version and mode conditions are met
Your environment is affected if you are using react-router 7.0.0-7.11.0 or @remix-run/server-runtime below 2.17.3 AND you have Framework Mode or React Server Actions in unstable RSC modes enabled (not Declarative Mode or Data Mode).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.17.3
Upgrade @remix-run/server-runtime to version 2.17.3 or react-router to version 7.12.0 or later. If upgrading is not feasible, ensure the application is using Declarative Mode or Data Mode which are not affected by this vulnerability.
react-router 7.12.0 or @remix-run/server-runtime 2.17.3
- Identify which product is in use: React Router 7.x (react-router package) or Remix Run/react (@remix-run/server-runtime package)
- For React Router 7.x: Update react-router to version 7.12.0 or later in package.json
- For Remix Run/react: Update @remix-run/server-runtime to version 2.17.3 or later in package.json
- Run npm install, yarn install, or pnpm install to install the updated package
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release
- Test the application, particularly any POST requests to UI routes using server-side actions or React Server Actions in RSC modes
- Ensure no regression in functionality, especially if using Framework Mode or unstable RSC modes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22030 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data