CVE-2026-22103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe NPC start endpoint on the web server at port 8090 is vulnerable to command injection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe NPC start endpoint on the web server at port 8090 does not properly sanitize user input before passing it to system commands, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary OS commands. This remote, unauthenticated command injection can lead to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify port 8090 is open and listeningRun 'netstat -tuln | grep 8090' or 'ss -tuln | grep 8090' to confirm the service is exposed on port 8090Affected if Port 8090 is open and accepting connections indicates potential exposure to this vulnerability
-
Identify the service on port 8090Use 'curl -v http://localhost:8090/' or 'nmap -sV -p 8090 <target>' to probe the service and identify the product name and version bannerAffected if The service is identified as the affected NPC server product with a version matching the vulnerable range
-
Confirm NPC start endpoint existsSend a request to the NPC start endpoint using 'curl -X POST http://<target>:8090/npc/start' or similar path that triggers the vulnerable command executionAffected if The endpoint responds (even with an error) confirming the NPC start functionality is present
-
Test for unauthenticated accessAttempt to access the NPC start endpoint without providing any credentials or authentication tokensAffected if The endpoint accepts requests without requiring authentication, indicating the flaw is exploitable
-
Check for input sanitization weaknessSend a test payload with special characters (e.g., ';whoami' or '|id') to the NPC start endpoint and observe if the input is passed to system commandsAffected if The response reflects injected characters or executes system commands, confirming the injection vulnerability exists
The system is affected if port 8090 is open, an NPC start endpoint exists that accepts unauthenticated requests, and user input is passed unsanitized to system commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and use parameterized APIs or safe command-execution methods instead of shell command concatenation. Restrict network access to port 8090 and apply authentication to the endpoint.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data