CVE-2026-22154
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting (XSS) attack via crafted HTTP Requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR allows authenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted HTTP requests. The malicious payload is stored and executed when other authenticated users view the affected content in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.3.0, < 7.5.3>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiSOAR version via CLILog into the FortiSOAR CLI and run the command `execute system version` or `fortisoar --version` to retrieve the installed version number.Affected if The displayed version falls within >= 7.3.0 and < 7.5.3, or >= 7.6.0 and < 7.6.4.
-
Check FortiSOAR version via web UILog into the FortiSOAR web interface, navigate to Help > About or System Settings > General, and locate the version information displayed there.Affected if The displayed version falls within the affected ranges specified above.
-
Compare version against advisory rangesDocument the exact version number (for example, 7.4.2 or 7.6.1) and manually compare it to the affected ranges: 7.3.0 <= version < 7.5.3 OR 7.6.0 <= version < 7.6.4.Affected if Your installed version matches any of the affected ranges.
-
Identify content modules accepting user inputReview which FortiSOAR modules (such as alerts, incidents, playbooks, or custom connectors) accept and store user-supplied content that gets rendered in the web interface for other users.Affected if The system stores and displays user-generated content to other authenticated users without strict output encoding.
You are affected if your FortiSOAR version is 7.3.0 or higher but lower than 7.5.3, or 7.6.0 or higher but lower than 7.6.4.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.37.6.4
Apply the vendor-supplied patch for FortiSOAR versions 7.3 through 7.6.3. Until patched, restrict user privileges for HTTP request handling and implement strict input validation with output encoding on all user-supplied content.
FortiSOAR 7.5.3+ or 7.6.4+ (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Identify your current FortiSOAR version by navigating to the UI dashboard or checking system information.
- 2. For FortiSOAR 7.5.x installations: Upgrade to version 7.5.3 or later.
- 3. For FortiSOAR 7.6.x installations: Upgrade to version 7.6.4 or later.
- 4. For FortiSOAR 7.3.x and 7.4.x installations: Upgrade to the minimum fixed release in your respective branch (7.5.3 or later for 7.5 branch, 7.6.4 or later for 7.6 branch).
- 5. After upgrade, verify the system is functioning correctly and test that the XSS vulnerability is remediated.
- 6. Review FortiSOAR release notes for any known issues or additional prerequisites before upgrading.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22154 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22154 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data