CVE-2026-22183
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedwpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the inline comment preview functionality that allows authenticated users to inject malicious scripts by submitting comments with unescaped content. Attackers with unfiltered_html capabilities can inject JavaScript directly through comment content rendered in the AJAX response from the getLastInlineComments() function in class.WpdiscuzHelperAjax.php without proper HTML escaping.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencewpDiscuz before 7.6.47 has a stored XSS vulnerability in the inline comment preview feature. The getLastInlineComments() function in class.WpdiscuzHelperAjax.php returns AJAX responses containing comment content without proper HTML escaping, allowing authenticated users with unfiltered_html capabilities to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when other users view the inline preview.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.6.47CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify wpDiscuz plugin installationCheck your WordPress plugins directory for wpdiscuz or look in wp-admin > Plugins for wpDiscuzAffected if wpDiscuz is installed and active
-
Determine installed versionCheck the plugin version in the wpDiscuz plugin header (usually in the main plugin file or readme.txt) and compare to 7.6.47Affected if Version is less than 7.6.47
-
Check if inline comment preview is enabledNavigate to wpDiscuz settings in WordPress admin and verify if the inline comment feature is turned onAffected if Inline comments are enabled and the version is below 7.6.47
-
Audit user roles with unfiltered_html capabilityReview which user roles or specific users have the unfiltered_html capability (typically found in user editing or role management plugins)Affected if Non-admin users have unfiltered_html capability AND inline comments are enabled AND version is below 7.6.47
You are affected if wpDiscuz version is below 7.6.47, the inline comment preview feature is enabled, and users other than trusted administrators have the unfiltered_html capability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.47
Upgrade wpDiscuz to version 7.6.47 or later which includes proper HTML escaping in the getLastInlineComments() function. Until then, restrict the unfiltered_html capability to trusted administrative users only.
7.6.47
- Update the wpDiscuz plugin to version 7.6.47 or later through the WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Alternatively, navigate to Plugins > Add New > Upload and upload the updated wpDiscuz plugin zip file from wordpress.org
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22183 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data