CVE-2026-22197
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGestSup versions prior to 3.2.60 contain multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the asset list functionality. Multiple request parameters used to filter, search, or sort assets are incorporated into SQL queries without sufficient neutralization, allowing an authenticated attacker to manipulate database queries. Successful exploitation can result in unauthorized access to or modification of database contents depending on database privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGestSup versions prior to 3.2.60 contain multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the asset list functionality. Multiple request parameters used to filter, search, or sort assets are incorporated into SQL queries without sufficient input sanitization, allowing an authenticated attacker to manipulate database queries and potentially access or modify database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.2.56CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GestSup versionLocate the version number displayed in the GestSup application interface (typically found in the footer, about page, or admin panel) or check version information in application configuration filesAffected if Installed version is 3.2.56 or earlier, or any version prior to 3.2.60
-
Identify if asset list functionality is enabledAccess the asset management section of the application and confirm the asset list feature is accessible and functionalAffected if Asset list feature is available and operational in the environment
-
Verify authentication requirements for asset endpointsTest access to asset list URLs or API endpoints without providing credentials to determine if authentication is enforcedAffected if Asset list endpoints are accessible without authentication or with low-privilege user accounts
-
Check for parameter manipulation in asset filteringExamine how asset search, filter, and sort parameters are handled by observing HTTP requests and responses when using these featuresAffected if Parameters used for filtering, searching, or sorting assets can be modified without input validation errors being triggered
-
Review database query handling for asset operationsIf database logging or application debugging is available, inspect logs for SQL query construction when asset list parameters are suppliedAffected if SQL queries incorporate user-supplied parameters directly without apparent sanitization or parameterized query usage
Environment is affected if GestSup version is 3.2.56 or earlier and the asset list functionality is accessible to the attacker, allowing SQL injection via unsanitized parameters in asset search, filter, or sort operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to GestSup version 3.2.60 or later which contains the security fix. Until then, restrict access to authenticated users only and consider implementing additional input validation at the application layer as a compensating control.
Gestsup 3.2.60
- 1. Backup the current Gestsup installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Download Gestsup version 3.2.60 or later from the official vendor source (gestsup.fr).
- 3. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure for installing the new version.
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Gestsup version number in the application.
- 5. Test the asset list functionality to confirm normal operation after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22197 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22197 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data