CVE-2026-22204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedwpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an email header injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate mail recipients by injecting malicious data into the comment_author_email cookie. Attackers can craft a malicious cookie value that, when processed through urldecode() and passed to wp_mail() functions, enables header injection to alter email recipients or inject additional headers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencewpDiscuz before 7.6.47 is vulnerable to email header injection via the comment_author_email cookie. The cookie value is processed through urldecode() and passed to wp_mail() without proper sanitization, allowing attackers to inject newline characters and manipulate email recipients or add arbitrary email headers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.6.47CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify wpDiscuz plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory or query the wp_options table for 'active_plugins' and look for 'wpdiscuz' or 'wpDiscuz' in the plugin list. Alternatively, check the file system at /wp-content/plugins/ for a wpdiscuz folder.Affected if wpDiscuz plugin is not found in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed wpDiscuz versionCheck the plugin header comment in wpdiscuz.php (typically at /wp-content/plugins/wpdiscuz/functions.php or /wp-content/plugins/wpdiscuz/wpdiscuz.php) for the 'Version' field, or query the WordPress options table for the version stored by the plugin.Affected if The version found is less than 7.6.47 (e.g., 7.6.0, 7.5.0, etc.)
-
Confirm comment submission feature is activeCheck WordPress settings at Settings > Discussion to ensure 'Allow people to post comments on new articles' is enabled, or inspect the wpDiscuz settings for comment form visibility.Affected if Comments are enabled and the wpDiscuz comment form is active on the site
You are affected if wpDiscuz is installed with a version lower than 7.6.47 and comment functionality using the wpDiscuz comment form is enabled on your site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.47
Upgrade wpDiscuz to version 7.6.47 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
wpDiscuz version 7.6.47
- 1. Backup your WordPress site database and files before performing any updates.
- 2. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins page.
- 3. Find the wpDiscuz plugin in the installed plugins list.
- 4. Click 'Update now' on the wpDiscuz plugin if an update is available, or manually update to version 7.6.47 or later.
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the installed version number.
- 6. Test that comment submission and email notifications still function correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data