CVE-2026-22213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRIOT OS versions up to and including 2026.01-devel-317 contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the tapslip6 utility. The vulnerability is caused by unsafe string concatenation in the devopen() function, which constructs a device path using unbounded user-controlled input. The utility uses strcpy() and strcat() to concatenate the fixed prefix '/dev/' with a user-supplied device name provided via the -s command-line option without bounds checking. This allows an attacker to supply an excessively long device name and overflow a fixed-size stack buffer, leading to process crashes and memory corruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in the tapslip6 utility's devopen() function where unbounded strcpy() and strcat() operations concatenate the fixed prefix '/dev/' with a user-supplied device name from the -s command-line option into a fixed-size stack buffer without any bounds checking, allowing an attacker to overflow the buffer with excessive input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.10= 2026.01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify tapslip6 utility is presentLocate the tapslip6 binary or source code in the RIOT OS environment (typically found inRIOTBOOT/examples/tapslip6 or similar paths)Affected if tapslip6 binary exists in the deployed system
-
Determine RIOT OS versionCheck the installed RIOT OS version against the affected ranges: versions < 2025.10 or exactly 2026.01 are vulnerableAffected if RIOT OS version is < 2025.10 or equals 2026.01
-
Identify tapslip6 usage with -s optionInspect how tapslip6 is invoked in your system; look for command-line execution or configuration that passes the -s option to specify a device nameAffected if tapslip6 is executed with the -s command-line option providing a device name
-
Check for long device name inputReview any scripts, configurations, or automated processes that call tapslip6 to see if they pass unusually long strings to the -s parameterAffected if The device name supplied via -s can exceed the stack buffer size (typically 64-128 bytes) before the '/dev/' prefix is added
A system is affected if it runs RIOT OS version < 2025.10 or = 2026.01 AND uses the tapslip6 utility with the -s command-line option to specify a device name, because this triggers the unbounded strcpy/strcat in devopen() that causes the buffer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.10
Replace unsafe strcpy()/strcat() with bounded alternatives (strncpy/strncat) and add input length validation to ensure the device name fits within the destination buffer before concatenation.
RIOT OS 2025.10 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current RIOT OS version in use by checking the version banner or version file in your deployment
- 2. Download RIOT OS version 2025.10 or later from the official RIOT OS repository (github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT)
- 3. Rebuild the tapslip6 utility from the updated source code using the standard RIOT build system (make clean && make)
- 4. Replace the vulnerable tapslip6 binary in your deployment with the newly compiled version
- 5. Verify the fix by testing tapslip6 with the -s option using both normal and excessively long input to confirm no buffer overflow occurs
- 6. If using RIOT 2026.01, ensure you migrate to the 2025.10 stable release or a subsequent version that includes the bounds-checked fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data