CVE-2026-22315
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Mesalvo Meona Client Launcher Component, Mesalvo Meona Server Component enables the export of user data, including cleartext passwords, via the SQL editor. This issue affects Meona Client Launcher Component: through 19.06.2020 15:11:49; Meona Server Component: through 2025.04 5+323020.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in Mesalvo Meona Client Launcher and Server Components allows privileged users to export user data, including cleartext passwords, through the SQL editor due to incorrect privilege assignment. The issue grants excessive permissions that bypass proper access controls, enabling unauthorized data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Mesalvo Meona installationLocate the Meona application installation directory or check system inventory/software list for 'Meona' or 'Mesalvo Meona'Affected if Meona clinical software is present in the environment
-
Identify SQL editor feature availabilityLog into the Meona application with a standard authenticated user account and navigate to the SQL editor module or data export functionalityAffected if The SQL editor is accessible to non-administrative user accounts
-
Verify user role assignments for SQL accessAccess the user role management or permission configuration within Meona and examine which roles are assigned access to the SQL editor or data export featuresAffected if Standard or non-admin roles have permissions to use the SQL editor or export user data
-
Check database for cleartext passwordsExecute a query via the SQL editor (if accessible) or directly on the database to examine the user password storage format: SELECT password FROM users or similar table containing credentialsAffected if User passwords are stored in cleartext rather than hashed format
-
Validate data export capability for user recordsUse the SQL editor to craft and execute a query that exports user records or sensitive data fieldsAffected if Authenticated users can export data containing passwords or other sensitive user information without elevated privileges
A user is affected if they have Mesalvo Meona installed and the SQL editor is accessible to non-administrative user accounts, allowing them to retrieve user data including cleartext passwords.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) to restrict SQL editor functionality, remove or encrypt cleartext password storage, and audit all privilege assignments to ensure least-privilege原则 is enforced.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22315 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data