CVE-2026-22326
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion in Reprizo <= 1.0.8 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in Reprizo versions 1.0.8 and below allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the server by manipulating file path parameters without requiring authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Reprizo is installedLook for Reprizo application files on the web server (e.g., index.php, config files, or Reprizo-specific directories in the web root)Affected if Reprizo application files are present on the server
-
Determine installed Reprizo versionCheck version files, headers, or application metadata (e.g., version.php, CHANGELOG, or the admin dashboard about page) and compare to 1.0.8Affected if The installed version is 1.0.8 or below
-
Identify exposed file path parametersReview application routes and parameters, looking for any endpoint that accepts a file path as a parameter (commonly in include, require, file, path, or page parameters)Affected if A parameter accepting file paths is accessible without authentication
-
Test for directory traversal vulnerabilitySend a request with directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../etc/passwd) to identified parameters to confirm the LFI existsAffected if The application returns contents of files outside the intended directory
-
Verify the endpoint requires no authenticationAttempt to access the vulnerable endpoint without providing any credentials or session tokenAffected if The endpoint is accessible without authentication
A user is affected if Reprizo version 1.0.8 or below is running and has an unauthenticated endpoint that accepts file path parameters vulnerable to directory traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Reprizo to a version newer than 1.0.8. If no patch is available, implement strict input validation to block directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../) and restrict file system access controls at the web server level.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22326 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data