CVE-2026-22331
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion in AutoParts <= 1.5.8 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in AutoParts e-commerce software versions 1.5.8 and below. Attackers can manipulate file path parameters to read sensitive server-side files without any authentication credentials, potentially exposing configuration files, source code, or system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AutoParts installation versionCheck version files (version.php, VERSION.txt), admin panel footer, or config files that may contain version strings; compare against 1.5.8Affected if Installed version is 1.5.8 or lower
-
Locate file inclusion functionalitySearch application source code for file inclusion functions (include, require, fopen with user input) and identify parameters that accept file paths (e.g., file, page, template, path, lang parameters)Affected if Application contains file inclusion parameters accepting user-controlled input
-
Verify endpoint accessibilityInspect web routing configuration and authentication middleware to determine if the file inclusion endpoint is reachable without login; check if authentication is enforced on routes handling file parametersAffected if File inclusion endpoint is accessible to unauthenticated users (no login required)
-
Check input validation on file parametersReview code that processes file path parameters for presence of sanitization; look for path traversal sequences (../, ..\) in validation logicAffected if No input validation or inadequate filtering exists on file path parameters
Environment is affected if AutoParts version 1.5.8 or lower is installed AND file inclusion parameters are accessible without authentication AND those parameters lack proper input validation against path traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade AutoParts to a version beyond 1.5.8. If no patch is available, implement strict input validation on file inclusion parameters and consider web application firewall rules to block path traversal sequences.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22331 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22331 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data