CVE-2026-22343
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Broken Access Control in WordPress Dating Theme <= 11.2.0 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Broken Access Control vulnerability in WordPress Dating Theme versions 11.2.0 and below allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authorization checks and access functionality or data that should require authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WordPress Dating Theme installationLocate the theme directory in wp-content/themes/ and check for a dating-themed theme folder (commonly 'dating-theme', 'sweetdate', or similar naming). List all installed themes via: ls -la wp-content/themes/Affected if WordPress Dating Theme is present in the themes directory
-
Retrieve installed theme versionOpen the theme's style.css file (e.g., wp-content/themes/dating-theme/style.css) and locate the 'Version:' header in the comment block at the top of the fileAffected if Version number is 11.2.0 or lower, or if no version is declared and the theme is confirmed as the Dating Theme
-
Compare version to affected rangeParse the version number found in style.css and compare against 11.2.0 using standard version comparisonAffected if The installed version is 11.2.0 or below (e.g., 11.2.0, 11.1.0, 10.5.0, etc.)
-
Test for unauthenticated access to sensitive endpointsAttempt to access common Dating Theme admin or user management endpoints without providing authentication credentials. Common paths include /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php, /wp-json/ endpoints, or theme-specific AJAX handlers. Use a browser or curl to send requests without cookies or authentication headersAffected if Requests to sensitive endpoints return successful responses (HTTP 200) rather than redirects to login (HTTP 302 to wp-login.php) or 401/403 errors
You are affected if the WordPress Dating Theme is installed with version 11.2.0 or below and sensitive endpoints are accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WordPress Dating Theme to patched version if available; otherwise implement proper capability checks and authentication verification on all sensitive endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22343 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22343 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data