PHP File Inclusion (RFI/LFI)Weakness · CWE-98

CVE-2026-22408

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Justicia justicia allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Justicia: from n/a through <= 1.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Mikado-Themes Justicia theme versions <=1.2 contains a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability where improper control of filename parameters in include/require statements allows attackers to include arbitrary local PHP files, potentially leading to remote code execution.

MitigationUpdate to the latest patched version of the Justicia theme; if unavailable, disable or remove the theme. Additionally, implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns (e.g., ../) in request parameters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Justicia theme installation
    Locate the theme files on the web server. Look for a directory named 'justicia' or 'mikado-themes/justicia' within the wp-content/themes or similar themes folder. Use commands like 'find /path/to/themes -type d -iname "*justicia*"' or inspect via file manager.
    Affected if The Justicia theme directory exists on the server.
  2. Determine installed theme version
    Open the style.css file within the Justicia theme directory and look for the 'Version:' comment in the file header, or check for a version.php or theme.json file. Compare the version number to 1.2.
    Affected if The reported version is 1.2 or lower.
  3. Identify vulnerable include/require patterns
    Search the theme PHP files for include, include_once, require, or require_once statements that use variables in the file path without proper sanitization. Use 'grep -r "include\|require" *.php' and examine any that concatenate or interpolate user input into the path.
    Affected if Any include/require statement uses a request parameter (e.g., $_GET, $_POST) directly in the file path without validation.
  4. Locate the vulnerable parameter
    Examine the identified include/require statements to find which $_GET or $_POST parameters flow into the file path. Check if the parameter allows directory traversal (e.g., ../../) or direct PHP file paths.
    Affected if A parameter used in the include/require accepts arbitrary file paths or traversal sequences.
  5. Verify web accessibility of vulnerable endpoint
    Determine if the PHP file containing the vulnerable include/require is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS on the web server. Attempt a harmless test request to the suspected endpoint, checking if it processes the file parameter.
    Affected if The page with the vulnerable code is reachable via web request.

A user is affected if the Justicia theme version is 1.2 or lower AND the theme is installed AND the vulnerable PHP file with unsafe include/require is accessible via the web.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest patched version of the Justicia theme; if unavailable, disable or remove the theme. Additionally, implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns (e.g., ../) in request parameters.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22408 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22408 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data