CVE-2026-22417
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Wedding grandwedding allows Object Injection.This issue affects Grand Wedding: from n/a through < 3.1.11.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDeserialization of untrusted data in the ThemeGoods Grand Wedding WordPress theme allows PHP object injection. Attackers can craft malicious serialized payloads that, when processed by vulnerable deserialization logic, may instantiate arbitrary objects and potentially achieve remote code execution depending on available magic methods.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Grand Wedding theme filesCheck wp-content/themes/ directory for a folder named 'grand-wedding', 'grand-wedding-child', or similar naming convention containing the themeAffected if The theme folder exists in the WordPress themes directory
-
Find theme version numberOpen the style.css file within the Grand Wedding theme folder and look for the 'Version:' declaration in the file header commentsAffected if Unable to locate version declaration or version number cannot be determined
-
Compare installed version to fixed versionCompare the discovered Version number against 3.1.11. Versions lower than 3.1.11 are vulnerableAffected if Installed version is below 3.1.11 (for example: 3.1.10, 3.1.9, 3.0.0, etc.)
-
Verify theme is activeIn WordPress admin dashboard, go to Appearance > Themes to confirm Grand Wedding is the currently active themeAffected if Theme is installed but not actively used - still patch as it could be activated at any time
The environment is affected if the Grand Wedding theme is installed with a version number lower than 3.1.11, regardless of whether it is currently active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Grand Wedding theme to version 3.1.11 or later which contains the patch for the unsafe deserialization vulnerability.
Grand Wedding theme version 3.1.11 or later
- 1. Backup your WordPress site before making any changes.
- 2. Navigate to your WordPress dashboard and go to Appearance > Themes.
- 3. Locate the Grand Wedding theme in your installed themes.
- 4. Check the current version of the Grand Wedding theme to confirm it is below 3.1.11.
- 5. If an update is available, click to update the theme to the latest version (3.1.11 or later).
- 6. If no update appears in WordPress, download the latest version from ThemeGoods official source or WordPress theme repository and upload/install it.
- 7. Verify the theme has been updated to version 3.1.11 or later.
- 8. Test critical site functionality after the update to ensure compatibility.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22417 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22417 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data