CVE-2026-2243
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in QEMU. A specially crafted VMDK image could trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability, potentially leading to a 12-byte leak of sensitive information or a denial of service condition (DoS).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceQEMU contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in its VMDK image parser. When processing a specially crafted VMDK image file, the parser reads 12 bytes beyond the intended buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive memory contents or causing a denial of service via crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm QEMU installationRun 'qemu-img --version' or 'qemu-system-x86_64 --version' to retrieve the installed QEMU versionAffected if QEMU is not installed or version cannot be determined
-
Compare installed version to advisoryCross-reference the QEMU version with the CVE-2026-2243 advisory from your vendor or the QEMU security mailing list to determine if it falls within the affected rangeAffected if The installed version is unpatched and listed as vulnerable in the CVE advisory
-
Verify VMDK image support is presentRun 'qemu-img info --backing-chain /path/to/test.vmdk' or check QEMU build configuration for VMDK driver support (qemu-img --help | grep -i vmdk)Affected if VMDK driver support is compiled into the QEMU binary and available for use
-
Identify VMDK image processing activityReview QEMU command lines, libvirt domain XML configurations, or system logs for instances where QEMU opens or converts VMDK files (look for .vmdk file extensions in QEMU-related processes)Affected if QEMU is actively used to open, convert, or run virtual machines from VMDK image files
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable, unpatched QEMU version AND uses that QEMU to process VMDK image files, as the out-of-bounds read triggers specifically during VMDK parsing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAvoid opening untrusted or unverified VMDK image files in QEMU environments. Apply vendor-supplied patches to QEMU when available and monitor for security updates addressing VMDK parsing vulnerabilities.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2243 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2243 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data