CVE-2026-2247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability (SQLi) in Clicldeu SaaS, specifically in the generation of reports, which occurs when a previously authenticated remote attacker executes a malicious payload in the URL generated after downloading the student's report card in the ‘Day-to-day’ section from the mobile application. In the URL of the generated PDF, the session token used does not expire, so it remains valid for days after its generation, and unusual characters can be entered after the ‘id_alu’ parameter, resulting in two types of SQLi: boolean-based blind and time-based blind. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow an attacker to access confidential information in the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability exists in the 'id_alu' parameter during report generation in Clicldeu SaaS's Day-to-day mobile application feature. An attacker with valid authentication can inject malicious SQL payloads (boolean-based blind or time-based blind) into the parameter. The issue is compounded by session tokens that never expire, remaining valid for days and allowing prolonged exploitation to extract confidential database information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Clicldeu SaaS deploymentInventory your SaaS applications and identify if Clicldeu (or a derivative/white-label version) is in use, particularly the Day-to-day moduleAffected if Clicldeu SaaS with Day-to-day mobile application feature is deployed and accessible
-
Identify report generation endpointLocate the report generation feature within the Day-to-day mobile application; capture the HTTP request that handles the 'id_alu' parameter during report generationAffected if The 'id_alu' parameter is present and accepts user-supplied input in the report generation functionality
-
Verify authentication requirementConfirm that valid authentication (session token) is required to access the vulnerable endpoint; check if the endpoint rejects unauthenticated requestsAffected if The endpoint requires valid authentication but lacks parameterized query handling for the id_alu parameter
-
Check session token expiration policyReview session management configuration or token validity duration settings; determine if tokens remain active beyond a short timeframe (e.g., days)Affected if Session tokens are configured to remain valid for extended periods without automatic expiration
-
Compare installed version to affected rangeIf version information is available for Clicldeu SaaS or its Day-to-day module, compare against any documented affected versions; otherwise treat all versions as potentially affectedAffected if The deployed version falls within an affected range or version information is unavailable (assume affected)
The environment is affected if Clicldeu SaaS with the Day-to-day mobile application feature is deployed, the report generation endpoint with the id_alu parameter is accessible (even with authentication), and session tokens do not expire promptly.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations involving user input, enforce immediate session token expiration after logout or inactivity, and add input validation to reject special characters in the id_alu parameter.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data