CVE-2026-22480
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in WebToffee Product Feed for WooCommerce webtoffee-product-feed allows Object Injection.This issue affects Product Feed for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 2.3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the WebToffee Product Feed for WooCommerce plugin caused by deserializing untrusted data (likely via PHP's unserialize() function on user-controlled input). Object injection attacks can exploit PHP magic methods to achieve arbitrary code execution if suitable gadgets exist in the application or its dependencies.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WebToffee Product Feed for WooCommerce is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory for the 'product-feed-managers-for-woocommerce' or 'webtoffee-product-feed' folder, or use wp-cli: wp plugin list --name='*feed*'Affected if The plugin is not installed on the WordPress site
-
Determine the installed plugin versionRead the main plugin PHP file header for the 'Version:' field, typically in plugin-name.php or readme.txt in the plugin directoryAffected if The version cannot be determined or falls within an affected range (compare against officially published vulnerable versions)
-
Locate deserialization calls in plugin filesSearch plugin directory for 'unserialize' function calls: grep -r "unserialize" /path/to/wp-content/plugins/product-feed-managers-for-woocommerce/Affected if unserialize() is called on data derived from $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or similar user-controlled sources without prior sanitization
-
Check access to the vulnerable input entry pointIdentify which plugin endpoints or parameters accept the untrusted input (review the code containing unserialize calls to trace the input source)Affected if The vulnerable parameter is accessible to unauthenticated or low-privilege users on the site
-
Review web server and application logs for exploitation attemptsSearch access logs for requests containing serialized payloads or suspicious patterns targeting the plugin's deserialization endpointAffected if Logs show known exploitation patterns or anomalous serialized data being submitted to the plugin
You are affected if the plugin is installed, uses a vulnerable version, and has unserialize() processing user-supplied input accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace unsafe deserialization (unserialize()) with safe alternatives like JSON decoding (json_decode()) for handling untrusted input, or implement proper input validation and whitelisting before deserialization.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22480 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22480 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data