CVE-2026-2257
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe GetGenie plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2 due to missing validation on a user controlled key in the `action` function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to update post metadata for arbitrary posts. Combined with a lack of input sanitization, this leads to Stored Cross-Site Scripting when a higher-privileged user (such as an Administrator) views the affected post's "Competitor" tab in the GetGenie sidebar.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe GetGenie WordPress plugin versions up to 4.3.2 contain an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the `action` function where user-controlled keys are not validated, allowing authenticated users with Author-level access to modify post metadata for arbitrary posts. Combined with missing input sanitization, this enables Stored XSS that executes when higher-privileged users (Administrators) view the affected post's 'Competitor' tab in the GetGenie sidebar.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GetGenie plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'getgenie' or query the wp_options table for 'active_plugins' to see if GetGenie is listed as an active plugin.Affected if GetGenie plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/ and the plugin is active in WordPress.
-
Determine installed GetGenie versionOpen the main plugin file (usually getgenie.php) in wp-content/plugins/getgenie/ and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or query the wp_options table for the option_name containing 'getgenie_version'.Affected if The version number found is 4.3.2 or lower (e.g., 4.3.0, 4.2.x, etc.).
-
Confirm the vulnerable action function existsInspect the main plugin file in wp-content/plugins/getgenie/ and search for a function named 'action' or any handler that processes user-controlled keys without validation, particularly related to post metadata operations.Affected if The plugin code contains an 'action' function or similar handler that processes request parameters as metadata keys without validating ownership or sanitizing input.
-
Check for Author-level user accountsReview WordPress user roles in the wp_users and wp_usermeta tables, or navigate to Users > All Users in the WordPress admin dashboard to identify any accounts assigned the Author role.Affected if At least one user account with the Author role exists in the WordPress installation.
-
Verify the Competitor feature is in useCheck if any posts have GetGenie-generated content by looking for post meta fields related to GetGenie (search wp_postmeta for keys containing 'getgenie' or 'competitor'), or inspect the GetGenie sidebar settings in the WordPress admin for the Competitor tab.Affected if Posts contain GetGenie metadata or the Competitor feature has been configured, allowing the stored XSS to execute when Administrators view the affected posts.
Your environment is affected if the GetGenie plugin is active at version 4.3.2 or lower, contains the vulnerable action function handling metadata, and there are Author-level users or posts using the Competitor feature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate GetGenie plugin to the latest version once available, or remove/disable the plugin until a patch is released. If the plugin must remain in use, implement strict capability checks and input sanitization on the action function as a temporary defensive measure.
4.3.3 or later
- Update the GetGenie plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2257 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2257 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data