CVE-2026-22574
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA storing passwords in a recoverable format vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to retrieve Service account password via server address modification in LDAP configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in FortiSOAR allows authenticated attackers to retrieve service account passwords stored in a recoverable format. The attack exploits LDAP configuration where an attacker can modify the server address to access stored credentials that are not properly hashed or encrypted, only encoded or encrypted with reversible methods.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.3.0, < 7.5.3>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiSOAR versionAccess the FortiSOAR admin console and navigate to the 'About' section or use the CLI command 'system version' to retrieve the installed version number.Affected if The installed version is 7.3.0 through 7.5.2, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.4.
-
Identify if LDAP integration is configuredNavigate to Administration > Authentication > LDAP in the FortiSOAR UI to list all configured LDAP connectors. Check whether any LDAP servers are defined with service account credentials.Affected if LDAP integrations are configured and active with stored service account credentials.
-
Verify user access to LDAP configurationReview user roles and permissions in Administration > Users & Roles. Check which roles have permissions to modify or view LDAP server configurations.Affected if Multiple users or roles have LDAP configuration permissions beyond strictly necessary administrators.
-
Inspect stored credential format in LDAP settingsExport or view the LDAP server configuration details. Examine whether the service account passwords are stored as encoded/encrypted values rather than hashed values.Affected if Service account passwords are stored in a reversible encoding or encryption format within the LDAP configuration.
You are affected if FortiSOAR version falls within 7.3.0-7.5.2 or 7.6.0-7.6.4 AND LDAP integrations with service account credentials are configured with users having access to modify LDAP settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.37.6.5
Upgrade to FortiSOAR versions 7.5.3, 7.6.5 or later. Until patched, restrict access to users with LDAP configuration permissions and monitor for unauthorized changes to LDAP server settings.
FortiSOAR 7.6.5 (for 7.6.x users) or FortiSOAR 7.5.3 (for 7.5.x and earlier users); latest 7.6.x release recommended
- Identify current FortiSOAR version by checking the About section in the FortiSOAR UI or via CLI: diagnose system version
- Determine which version branch is currently in use (7.3.x, 7.4.x, 7.5.x, or 7.6.x)
- For FortiSOAR 7.6.0-7.6.4: Upgrade to version 7.6.5 or later
- For FortiSOAR 7.5.0-7.5.2: Upgrade to version 7.5.3 or later
- For FortiSOAR 7.4.x: Upgrade to 7.5.3 or later (7.4 is end-of-life; migrate to 7.5 or 7.6)
- For FortiSOAR 7.3.x: Upgrade to 7.5.3 or later (7.3 is end-of-life; migrate to 7.5 or 7.6)
- After upgrade, verify LDAP configuration integrity and ensure no unauthorized modifications exist
- Review LDAP server settings to confirm only trusted admin accounts have configuration access
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22574 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22574 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data