CVE-2026-22576
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA storing passwords in a recoverable format vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to retrieve passwords for multiple installed connectors via server address modification in connector configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiSOAR stores connector passwords in a recoverable (reversible) encrypted format rather than using irreversible hashing. An authenticated attacker with access to connector configuration can modify the server address to trigger the system to return plaintext passwords for multiple installed connectors, exploiting the reversible encryption and insufficient authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.3.0, < 7.5.3>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSOAR versionRun 'fwmanager -g --get-version' or check the FortiSOAR UI under System > Settings > About to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The installed version falls within >= 7.3.0 and < 7.5.3, or >= 7.6.0 and < 7.6.5
-
Verify connector configuration presenceNavigate to War Room > Connectors or use the API endpoint '/api/3/connectors' to list installed connectorsAffected if Any connectors are installed and configured with stored credentials
-
Check user role permissions for connector settingsGo to Administration > Users > Roles in the FortiSOAR UI and review which roles have 'Connector' or 'Configuration' permissions enabledAffected if Non-administrator users or users beyond the intended scope have access to modify connector configurations
-
Inspect stored credential encryption formatQuery the FortiSOAR database (typically PostgreSQL) for the ' connectors' table and examine the 'password' or 'encrypted_password' field - look for base64-encoded or encrypted values rather than hashed valuesAffected if Connector passwords are stored in a reversible format (encrypted, base64, or similar) rather than being irreversibly hashed
You are affected if FortiSOAR version is within the vulnerable ranges AND connectors with stored credentials are configured, regardless of whether users have accessed the plaintext passwords.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.37.6.5
Upgrade to FortiSOAR versions 7.6.5 or later (or the latest patched release for 7.5 and 7.4 branches). If patching is not immediately feasible, review connector configurations for unauthorized access and restrict administrative access to connector settings.
FortiSOAR 7.6.5 or later (or 7.5.3+ for those staying on the 7.5 branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiSOAR version by checking the system information in the FortiSOAR administration panel.
- 2. For systems on version 7.3.x or 7.4.x: Plan migration to version 7.6.5 or later as these branches are no longer explicitly mentioned as fixed.
- 3. For systems on version 7.5.0-7.5.2: Upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.5.3 or later.
- 4. For systems on version 7.6.0-7.6.4: Upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.6.5 or later.
- 5. Before upgrading, perform a full backup of the FortiSOAR database and configuration.
- 6. Review the FortiSOAR upgrade guide for your deployment type (PaaS or on-premise) for any prerequisites.
- 7. Apply the upgrade during a planned maintenance window following standard FortiSOAR upgrade procedures.
- 8. After upgrade, verify that connector configurations are intact and retest that passwords are no longer retrievable via the documented attack vector.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22576 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data