Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2026-22623

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to insufficient input parameter validation on the interface, authenticated users of certain HIKSEMI NAS products can execute arbitrary commands on the device by crafting specific messages.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authenticated command injection vulnerability in HIKSEMI NAS products. Due to insufficient input parameter validation on the interface, authenticated users can execute arbitrary commands on the device by crafting specific messages. The vulnerability requires authentication but allows complete system compromise through the web interface.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available; restrict network access to the NAS management interface to trusted users; monitor for unauthorized access attempts; consider network segmentation for NAS devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm HIKSEMI NAS product
    Identify the device manufacturer and model through device labeling, web interface footer, or SNMP/sysinfo queries. HIKSEMI NAS devices typically display the brand in the login page or admin dashboard.
    Affected if The device is a HIKSEMI NAS product with web management interface
  2. Check web interface status
    Verify whether the NAS web management interface is accessible on the device (typically ports 80/443 or custom HTTP/HTTPS ports). Attempt access to the login page.
    Affected if The web interface is exposed and reachable on the network
  3. Determine installed firmware version
    Log into the web interface as an administrator and navigate to System Settings, About, or Firmware Information page to retrieve the exact firmware version. Alternatively, check via CLI if SSH/telnet access is available.
    Affected if The installed firmware version matches or falls within an affected version range (compare against vendor security advisories)
  4. Review authentication and command execution logs
    Examine system logs, access logs, and audit trails for any suspicious commands, unexpected API calls, or actions performed by user accounts, particularly those involving shell execution or system commands.
    Affected if Logs show unauthorized or unexpected command executions, especially involving shell interpreters or system utilities
  5. Inspect user accounts and sessions
    Check the list of registered users, recent login sessions, and active admin sessions through the web interface or system logs for any unauthorized or anomalous accounts.
    Affected if Unknown user accounts exist or sessions show commands originating from unexpected sources

A defender is affected if they operate a HIKSEMI NAS device with an accessible web interface and authenticated user access, where the installed firmware version matches known vulnerable versions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available; restrict network access to the NAS management interface to trusted users; monitor for unauthorized access attempts; consider network segmentation for NAS devices.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22623 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data