CVE-2026-22644
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain requests pass the authentication token in the URL as string query parameter, making it vulnerable to theft through server logs, proxy logs and Referer headers, which could allow an attacker to hijack the user's session and gain unauthorized access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthentication tokens are being transmitted as URL query parameters instead of in HTTP headers or secure cookies. This exposes tokens in server access logs, proxy logs, and Referer headers, enabling session hijacking via token theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Sick Incoming Goods Suite installationLocate the application installation directory or check running processes for the Sick Incoming Goods Suite softwareAffected if The software is installed and in use
-
Inspect authentication token transmission methodCapture or review HTTP requests made during authentication (login) and subsequent API calls. Examine whether tokens appear in the URL query string (e.g., ?token=abc123) rather than in Authorization headers or cookiesAffected if Authentication tokens are included as URL query parameters in HTTP requests
-
Examine server access logs for token exposureReview web server access logs (e.g., Apache access.log, Nginx access.log, IIS logs) for requests containing token values in the URL pathAffected if Tokens are logged in plain text within URL request lines in server access logs
-
Review proxy server logs for token leakageCheck any reverse proxy, load balancer, or API gateway logs for captured URL query parameters containing authentication tokensAffected if Proxy logs contain authentication tokens as part of logged URL query strings
-
Inspect Referer header exposureAnalyze HTTP traffic or logs for instances where authentication tokens in URLs are leaked via the Referer header to third-party sites or downstream servicesAffected if Tokens are transmitted in URLs and potentially exposed through Referer headers to external domains
If authentication tokens for Sick Incoming Goods Suite are transmitted as URL query parameters and appear in server, proxy, or Referer header logs, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataMigrate authentication from URL query parameters to HTTP Authorization headers or secure HTTP-only cookies, and implement log sanitization to prevent sensitive parameter capture.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22644 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22644 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data