CVE-2026-22676
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBarracuda RMM versions prior to 2025.2.2 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows local attackers to gain SYSTEM-level privileges by exploiting overly permissive filesystem ACLs on the C:\Windows\Automation directory. Attackers can modify existing automation content or place attacker-controlled files in this directory, which are then executed under the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM account during routine automation cycles, typically succeeding within the next execution cycle.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBarracuda RMM versions before 2025.2.2 have an insecure filesystem ACL vulnerability on the C:\Windows\Automation directory that allows local authenticated attackers to modify or insert malicious files. These files execute under the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM account during normal automation cycles, enabling complete privilege escalation to full system control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Barracuda RMM is installedCheck for Barracuda RMM installation by looking for the product in Add/Remove Programs, or check for the installation directory (commonly under C:\Program Files\Barracuda\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Barracuda\). Also verify the Windows service 'Barracuda RMM' exists using 'services.msc'.Affected if Barracuda RMM is not installed on the system - you are not affected by this CVE.
-
Determine installed Barracuda RMM versionOpen the Barracuda RMM application and navigate to the About or Settings section to view the version number, or check the installed programs list in Control Panel for the version entry. If you have access to the installation logs, the version is often recorded there.Affected if The installed version is before 2025.2.2 - your environment is potentially affected.
-
Inspect ACL on C:\Windows\Automation directoryRight-click the C:\Windows\Automation folder in File Explorer, select Properties, then go to the Security tab. Click 'Advanced' to view the permission entries. Alternatively, run 'icacls C:\Windows\Automation' from an elevated command prompt to list all permission entries.Affected if Non-admin users or groups have Write or Modify permissions on this directory - your environment is vulnerable.
-
Audit for unauthorized files in the automation directoryOpen C:\Windows\Automation in File Explorer and examine all files present. Check file creation/modification dates and ownership. Run 'dir C:\Windows\Automation /a' from command prompt to list all files including hidden ones.Affected if Unexpected or newly created files appear in this directory that you did not place there - potential compromise indicator.
Your environment is affected if Barracuda RMM version is before 2025.2.2 AND non-admin accounts have write access to the C:\Windows\Automation directory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Barracuda RMM to version 2025.2.2 or later to obtain the vendor patch. As an interim measure, restrict write access to the C:\Windows\Automation directory to administrative accounts only and audit the directory for any unauthorized files.
2025.2.2
- Identify the current Barracuda RMM version installed on the system
- Navigate to the Barracuda RMM administration console or use the built-in version checker
- Upgrade Barracuda RMM to version 2025.2.2 or later
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully
- Confirm the C:\Windows\Automation directory permissions have been tightened in the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22676 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22676 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data