Stack-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-121

CVE-2026-22904

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper length handling when parsing multiple cookie fields (including TRACKID) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send oversized cookie values and trigger a stack buffer overflow, resulting in a denial‑of‑service condition and possible remote code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cookie parsing logic (specifically the TRACKID field) due to improper length handling. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send oversized cookie values that exceed buffer boundaries, causing denial of service and potentially achieving remote code execution.

MitigationImplement proper bounds checking and length validation when parsing cookie values, particularly for the TRACKID field. Consider imposing maximum length limits on cookie values and using safe string handling functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the application that handles TRACKID cookies
    Review your web server, application server, or middleware logs to identify the product/service that processes HTTP cookie headers. Look for the specific software name in process lists or service configurations.
    Affected if The identified product processes cookie headers including a TRACKID field and is the software associated with this vulnerability.
  2. Determine the installed software version
    Use the package manager, binary version flags, or check the application's about/version page. Common commands: dpkg -l, rpm -qi, or the application's CLI version flag.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within an affected range where the vulnerability exists (if a fix version becomes available, any version before that fix is potentially vulnerable).
  3. Verify cookie parsing is enabled
    Inspect the application configuration files for cookie-related settings. Check if the TRACKID cookie functionality is actively used in the web application or API.
    Affected if Cookie parsing for the TRACKID field is enabled and the application accepts cookie headers from remote clients.
  4. Inspect cookie handling configuration
    Review configuration files (often in /etc, /conf, or application-specific directories) for cookie parsing settings. Look for any max-length parameters or validation rules related to the TRACKID field.
    Affected if No explicit maximum length limit is configured for cookie values, or the TRACKID field lacks input validation settings.
  5. Check application logs for anomalous cookie activity
    Review web access logs and application logs for requests with unusually large cookie values, especially those containing TRACKID. Look for truncation patterns or errors related to cookie parsing.
    Affected if Logs show truncated cookie values, parsing errors, or crashes coinciding with requests containing the TRACKID cookie.

You are affected if the application processes TRACKID cookie values without proper bounds checking and accepts cookie input from unauthenticated remote sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper bounds checking and length validation when parsing cookie values, particularly for the TRACKID field. Consider imposing maximum length limits on cookie values and using safe string handling functions.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22904 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22904 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data