CWE-552Weakness · CWE-552

CVE-2026-2330

CRITICAL · 9.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An attacker may access restricted filesystem areas on the device via the CROWN REST interface due to incomplete whitelist enforcement. Certain directories intended for internal testing were not covered by the whitelist and are accessible without authentication. An unauthenticated attacker could place a manipulated parameter file that becomes active after a reboot, allowing modification of critical device settings, including network configuration and application parameters.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The CROWN REST interface has an incomplete whitelist enforcement that fails to protect certain internal testing directories. Unauthenticated attackers can access these restricted filesystem areas and place manipulated parameter files that become active after device reboot, allowing modification of critical device settings including network configuration and application parameters.

MitigationImplement comprehensive whitelist enforcement covering all internal testing directories, disable unauthenticated parameter file modification, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the REST interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CROWN REST interface exposure
    Determine if the CROWN REST interface is accessible on the network by checking listening services (e.g., netstat, nmap scan on common HTTP/HTTPS ports) or reviewing device network configuration
    Affected if The CROWN REST interface is exposed and accessible to network attackers
  2. Check whitelist configuration for testing directories
    Review the CROWN REST interface configuration files for whitelist rules that should restrict access to internal testing directories. Look for any incomplete or missing whitelist entries
    Affected if The whitelist does not cover all internal testing directories, leaving them accessible
  3. Verify unauthenticated access to restricted paths
    Attempt to access known internal testing directory paths via the REST interface without authentication (e.g., curl http(s)://<device>/internal/test/ or similar paths)
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests successfully reach restricted filesystem areas
  4. Inspect parameter file locations and permissions
    Examine the filesystem for parameter file storage locations (typically in /config, /param, /settings, or similar directories mentioned in device documentation). Check file permissions and write access controls
    Affected if Parameter files are stored in accessible locations with insufficient access controls
  5. Confirm reboot behavior for parameter files
    Review device documentation or test in a safe environment to determine whether parameter files placed in accessible directories become active after device reboot
    Affected if Placing files in accessible directories modifies critical settings upon reboot

A user is affected if the CROWN REST interface is accessible and its whitelist configuration fails to protect internal testing directories, allowing unauthenticated modification of parameter files that activate on reboot.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement comprehensive whitelist enforcement covering all internal testing directories, disable unauthenticated parameter file modification, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the REST interface.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2330 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data