CVE-2026-23479
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRedis is an in-memory data structure store. In redis-server from 7.2.0 until 8.6.3, the unblock client flow does not handle an error return from `processCommandAndResetClient` when re-executing a blocked command. If a blocked client is evicted during this flow, an authenticated attacker can trigger a use-after-free that may lead to remote code execution. This has been patched in version 8.6.3.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Autonomous AI Tool Finds 2-Year-Old RCE Flaw in Redis (CVE-2026 ...
- Weekly Recap: Exchange 0-Day, npm Worm, Fake AI Repo, Cisco Exploit ...
- The Hacker News | #1 Trusted Source for Cybersecurity News — Index Page
- Xint.io | Best Automated Pentesting Platform
- Redis — Latest News, Reports & Analysis | The Hacker News
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn redis-server versions 7.2.0 through 8.6.2, the unblock client flow fails to properly handle an error return from `processCommandAndResetClient` when re-executing a blocked command. When a blocked client is evicted during this flow, an authenticated attacker can trigger a use-after-free vulnerability that may lead to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.2.0, < 8.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Redis server versionRun `redis-server --version` or `redis-cli INFO server | grep redis_version`Affected if Version is 7.2.0 through 8.6.3 (inclusive of 7.2.0, exclusive of 8.6.3)
-
Identify if blocking commands are in useRun `redis-cli INFO commandstats | grep -E 'cmd=blpop|cmd=brpop|cmd=blmove|cmd=brpoplpush'` to check usage of blocking list commands, or monitor active connections with `redis-cli CLIENT LIST`Affected if Applications use blocking commands (BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE) and clients can be evicted while blocked
-
Check client output buffer limitsInspect `redis-cli CONFIG GET client-output-buffer-limit` - look for configured client eviction thresholdsAffected if Client output buffer limits are set that allow client eviction under memory pressure
-
Verify client authentication is enabledRun `redis-cli CONFIG GET requirepass` to check if password authentication is requiredAffected if Authenticated clients can connect (any password set or no password, as attacker needs valid authentication to trigger the flaw)
A user is affected if running Redis 7.2.0-8.6.3 with blocking commands active, authenticated clients present, and client eviction enabled, allowing a blocked client to be evicted during unblock/re-execution flow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.3
Upgrade redis-server to version 8.6.3 or later to apply the patch that properly handles error returns in the unblock client flow.
8.6.3 or later
- Upgrade Redis to version 8.6.3 or later. For example, using package manager: `apt-get update && apt-get install redis-server` (Debian/Ubuntu) or `yum update redis` (RHEL/CentOS).
- If using a containerized deployment, update the Docker image tag to `redis:8.6.3` or later in your docker-compose.yml or Kubernetes deployment.
- After upgrade, restart the Redis service: `systemctl restart redis-server` or `systemctl restart redis`.
- Verify Redis is running and the version is correct: `redis-server --version` should show 8.6.3 or higher.
- Test that the Redis server is functioning properly: run `redis-cli ping` which should return PONG.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23479 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data