CVE-2026-23549
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpEvently mage-eventpress allows Object Injection.This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through <= 5.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability is a PHP Object Injection flaw in the WpEvently (mage-eventpress) WordPress plugin. It allows attackers to deserialize untrusted data, potentially leading to remote code execution if a suitable PHP 'gadget chain' exists in the application or other installed plugins.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'WpEvently' or 'mage-eventpress' or 'MageEventPress' in the installed plugins listAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Identify installed versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, click on the plugin name to view details, or check the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/mage-eventpress/mage-eventpress.php for the 'Version' commentAffected if The version is unknown, unpatched, or older than the fixed release version
-
Verify deserialization is reachableSearch the plugin files (especially in includes/ or classes/ directories) for calls to PHP unserialize() function that accept user-controlled input (e.g., $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST parameters)Affected if The plugin code contains unserialize() calls processing untrusted input without validation
-
Check for gadget chain dependenciesReview all installed WordPress plugins for known PHP Object Injection gadget chains (common ones: Popular Gadget, YARPP, Caldera Forms, Gravity Forms, or custom theme code with __wakeup/__set/__get magic methods)Affected if Any other installed plugin or theme contains exploitable gadget chain classes that could be triggered via the vulnerable deserialization point
You are affected if WpEvently/mage-eventpress is installed with a vulnerable version that processes untrusted serialized data AND a gadget chain exists somewhere in the WordPress environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately update WpEvently to the latest version if available. If no patch exists, disable and remove the plugin until a fix is released.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23549 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23549 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data