CVE-2026-23646
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Users of OpenProject versions prior to 16.6.5 and 17.0.1 have the ability to view and end their active sessions via Account Settings → Sessions. When deleting a session, it was not properly checked if the session belongs to the user. As the ID that is used to identify these session objects use incremental integers, users could iterate requests using `DELETE /my/sessions/:id` and thus unauthenticate other users. Users did not have access to any sensitive information (like browser identifier, IP addresses, etc) of other users that are stored in the session. The problem was patched in OpenProject versions 16.6.5 and 17.0.1. No known workarounds are available as this does not require any permissions or other that can temporarily be disabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenProject before 16.6.5 and 17.0.1 contains an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability in the session management endpoint. The DELETE /my/sessions/:id endpoint did not verify that the session being deleted belongs to the authenticated user, allowing attackers to iterate through incremental session IDs and forcibly unauthenticate other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.6.5= 17.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OpenProject versionLog in as an administrator and navigate to Administration > Information, or check the OpenProject API endpoint /api/v3/version, or look for a VERSION file in the application rootAffected if The version displayed is less than 16.6.5 or equals 17.0.0 exactly
-
Verify session management endpoint existsAttempt to access the DELETE /my/sessions/:id endpoint by making an HTTP DELETE request to /my/sessions/1 (authenticated as any user)Affected if The endpoint responds (even with an error) indicating the session management feature is active
-
Confirm user sessions are stored in the databaseCheck if OpenProject is configured to use database-backed sessions by reviewing config/configuration.yml or the session_store configuration in config/initializers/session_store.rbAffected if Database-backed sessions are enabled (the default configuration) - this is required for the IDOR to be exploitable
A user is affected if their OpenProject installation version is less than 16.6.5 or exactly 17.0.0 and the session management feature is active with database-backed sessions enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.6.5
Upgrade to OpenProject version 16.6.5 or 17.0.1 or later. No workarounds exist as this vulnerability does not require special permissions.
OpenProject 16.6.5+ (stable/16) or 17.0.1+ (stable/17)
- Identify your current OpenProject version by checking the admin panel or running `openproject --version`
- If running version 16.x (prior to 16.6.5), upgrade to version 16.6.5 or later in the 16.x stable branch
- If running version 17.0.0, upgrade to version 17.0.1 or later in the 17.x stable branch
- Follow the official OpenProject upgrade documentation for your installation method (e.g., packaged installation, Docker, or source)
- After upgrade, verify the fix by attempting to access a session ID that does not belong to your user - the API should return a 403 Forbidden error
- Test that legitimate session deletion via Account Settings → Sessions still functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23646 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data