Deserialization of Untrusted DataWeakness · CWE-502

CVE-2026-23798

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in blubrry PowerPress Podcasting powerpress allows Object Injection.This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting: from n/a through <= 11.15.10.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin for WordPress contains a deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502) where untrusted data is passed to PHP's unserialize() function, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects. This could lead to remote code execution, file operations, or other attacks depending on available classes in the application scope.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version of PowerPress Podcasting plugin (11.15.11 or higher) immediately. If no patch is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify PowerPress plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'PowerPress Podcasting' or 'Blubrry PowerPress' in the list. Alternatively, check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'powerpress' or 'blubrry-powerpress'.
    Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Determine the installed PowerPress version
    In WordPress admin, click on the PowerPress plugin in the plugin list to view the version number displayed below the plugin name. Alternatively, check the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/powerpress/powerpress.php or /wp-content/plugins/blubrry-powerpress/powerpress.php for the 'Version' tag.
    Affected if The version is lower than 11.15.11 (e.g., 11.15.10 or earlier)
  3. Check for known vulnerable entry points
    Search the plugin directory for uses of unserialize() function by examining PHP files in the powerpress plugin folder. Look for code patterns like 'unserialize($_GET[', 'unserialize($_POST[', or 'unserialize($_REQUEST' that accept user input directly.
    Affected if The plugin code contains unserialize() calls handling untrusted input without validation
  4. Review access logs for deserialization attack signatures
    Examine web server access logs (Apache, Nginx) for requests to the PowerPress plugin that contain PHP serialized object patterns (e.g., O: followed by numbers, a: followed by array counts). Look for base64-encoded serialized payloads often seen in exploitation attempts.
    Affected if Log entries show serialized PHP objects being sent to PowerPress endpoints
  5. Check for malicious files created via exploitation
    Look in the wp-content/uploads/ directory and other writable locations for newly created PHP files with suspicious names, encoded content, or shell scripts. Also check for modifications to existing plugin files that may have been injected.
    Affected if Unexpected PHP files exist or known plugin files have been modified without intentional admin changes

A user is affected if the PowerPress Podcasting plugin is installed with a version lower than 11.15.11 and contains vulnerable unserialize() code handling untrusted input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest version of PowerPress Podcasting plugin (11.15.11 or higher) immediately. If no patch is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23798 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data