CVE-2026-23925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authenticated Zabbix user (User role) with template/host write permissions is able to create objects via the configuration.import API. This can lead to confidentiality loss by creating unauthorized hosts. Note that the User role is normally not sufficient to create and edit templates/hosts even with write permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn authenticated Zabbix user with User role and template/host write permissions can bypass normal authorization restrictions via the configuration.import API to create unauthorized hosts, leading to confidentiality loss. The User role is normally restricted from creating/editing hosts and templates, but the import function does not properly enforce these role-based restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.41>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.18>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Zabbix server versionAccess Zabbix web UI dashboard or run 'zabbix_server --version' on the server. The version is typically displayed in the UI footer or via the command line.Affected if The installed version falls within >= 6.0.0 and < 6.0.41, OR >= 7.0.0 and < 7.0.18, OR >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.2
-
Confirm User role is active with write permissionsIn Zabbix UI, navigate to Users > Users > select a user with User role. Go to Permissions tab and verify if the user has write permissions to Templates or Hosts groups.Affected if The user has the basic User role AND has been granted write permissions to templates or hosts
-
Verify API access is enabledCheck Administration > Scripts or verify API is not disabled in zabbix.conf. Confirm the configuration.import API endpoint is accessible (usually at /api_jsonrpc.php).Affected if API access is enabled and the configuration.import method is available to the user
-
Review API audit logs for import operationsCheck Zabbix audit log (Reports > Audit) or system logs for recent configuration.import API calls performed by users with User role.Affected if Users with User role have successfully executed configuration.import to create hosts or templates despite lacking full permissions
A user is affected if running a Zabbix version within the affected ranges AND has users with User role granted write permissions to templates/hosts, allowing unauthorized object creation via the configuration.import API.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.0.417.0.187.4.2
Restrict or disable the configuration.import API capability for User role accounts and apply vendor-provided patches to properly enforce role-based access controls on import operations.
Upgrade to 6.0.41, 7.0.18, or 7.4.2 (or later) depending on your current major branch
- 1. Identify the current Zabbix version by checking Administration > System Information in the web UI or running `zabbix_server --version`
- 2. For Zabbix 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.41 or later
- 3. For Zabbix 7.0.x: Upgrade to version 7.0.18 or later
- 4. For Zabbix 7.4.x: Upgrade to version 7.4.2 or later
- 5. After upgrading, verify the fix by testing that users with only User role and write permissions cannot create hosts/templates via configuration.import API
- 6. Review user role permissions to ensure they align with least-privilege principles
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data