CVE-2026-24309
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to missing authorization check in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP, an authenticated attacker could execute specific ABAP function module to read, modify or insert entries into the database configuration table of the ABAP system. This unauthorized content change could lead to reduced system performance or interruptions. The vulnerability has low impact on the application's integrity and availability, with no effect on confidentiality.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP, a missing authorization check allows authenticated attackers to execute a specific ABAP function module to read, modify, or insert entries into database configuration tables, potentially causing system performance degradation or interruptions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 700= 701= 702= 731= 740= 750= 751= 752= 753= 754= 755= 756CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP versionCheck the installed SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP version by accessing system information via transaction SM51 or using the SAP system information function. Compare the version number against the affected list: 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756.Affected if The installed version matches any of the listed affected versions.
-
Identify exposed ABAP function moduleReview the SAP system for presence of the vulnerable function module mentioned in the security note. Use transaction SE37 or SE80 to search for function modules that handle database configuration table operations (read, modify, insert). Check if any such module is accessible without proper authorization checks.Affected if The specific function module is present in the system and can be executed by authenticated users without authorization verification.
-
Check authorization object configurationExamine the authorization objects assigned to the vulnerable function module using transaction SU24 or by reviewing the module's code in SE37. Verify if proper authorization checks are implemented for the database configuration table operations.Affected if The function module lacks proper authorization object checks or uses permissive authorizations that allow unrestricted access to database configuration tables.
-
Review database configuration table access logsMonitor transaction logs via ST03N or check audit logs via SM37 for unusual activity on database configuration tables. Look for execution patterns of the vulnerable function module by users who should not have modification privileges.Affected if Unauthorized or unexpected modifications to database configuration tables are observed in system logs.
A user is affected if their SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version matches the affected list AND the vulnerable function module is accessible without proper authorization checks, allowing unauthorized read, modify, or insert operations on database configuration tables.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant SAP security patch to implement proper authorization checks on the affected ABAP function module, and review access controls to ensure only authorized users can modify database configuration tables.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24309 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data