CVE-2026-24319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn SAP Business One, sensitive information is written to the application�s memory dump files without obfuscation. Gaining access to this information could potentially lead to unauthorized operations within the B1 environment, including modification of company data. This issue results in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAP Business One writes sensitive information to application memory dump files in plaintext/unobfuscated form. When these dump files are generated (during crashes, debugging, or diagnostics), any sensitive data present in memory at that time gets captured without redaction. An attacker with access to these dump files can extract credentials, business data, or other sensitive information that could enable unauthorized operations and data modification within the B1 environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SAP Business One version 10.0 is installedCheck the installed version of SAP Business One in the system via the SAP Business One client, version information in the installer, or system information tool. Compare your installed version against the affected range (version 10.0).Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.0
-
Locate memory dump file generation settingsInspect SAP Business One configuration files, diagnostic settings, or logging configurations that control whether memory dumps are enabled or generated. Look for settings related to crash dumps, debugging traces, or diagnostic file output.Affected if Memory dump or diagnostic file generation is enabled in the SAP Business One configuration
-
Search for existing memory dump filesSearch the SAP Business One installation directory and associated data directories for file types commonly associated with memory dumps (such as .dmp, .mdmp, .hdmp, crash reports, or diagnostic output files).Affected if Any memory dump, crash dump, or diagnostic files exist in the SAP Business One environment
-
Inspect dump files for sensitive dataIf dump files exist, examine their contents (using a text editor or string search utility) for plaintext sensitive information such as credentials, user passwords, business data, or other confidential fields that should have been obfuscated or excluded.Affected if Dump files contain plaintext credentials, passwords, or other sensitive business data in unobfuscated form
-
Review dump file access controlsCheck file system permissions on directories where dump files are stored to determine if unauthorized users or processes could access these files.Affected if Dump files or their storage directories have overly permissive access controls allowing unauthorized access
A user is affected if they have SAP Business One version 10.0 with memory dump generation enabled and dump files exist that contain plaintext sensitive information accessible to unauthorized parties.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThe primary remediation involves implementing data obfuscation or exclusion logic before writing any data to memory dump files. This may include sanitizing sensitive fields, encrypting dump contents, or preventing sensitive data from being included in dumps altogether. Additionally, securing dump file storage locations and access controls can reduce exposure risk.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation60.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $29,056.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data