CVE-2026-24322
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP Solution Tools Plug-In (ST-PI) contains a function module that does not perform the necessary authorization checks for authenticated users, allowing sensitive information to be disclosed. This vulnerability has a high impact on confidentiality and does not affect integrity or availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSAP Solution Tools Plug-In (ST-PI) contains a function module that fails to enforce proper authorization checks for authenticated users, allowing privilege escalation that enables unauthorized access to sensitive data. This is an access control bypass vulnerability where any authenticated user can potentially retrieve information they are not authorized to view.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 740= 758= 2008_1_700= 2008_1_710CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ST-PI component is installedLog into SAP system and navigate to System > Status, or use transaction SM51 to check installed software components. Look for 'ST-PI' or 'Solution Tools Plug-In' in the component list.Affected if ST-PI component is not found in the installed components list, then the system is not affected by this CVE.
-
Determine installed ST-PI versionIn SAP GUI, use transaction SAINT (SAP Add-On Installation Tool) or execute report SAPLSTPI or check the table TADIR for component ST-PI. Alternatively, use transaction SE03 and look for the ST-PI version information in the system component overview.Affected if The installed version matches 740, 758, 2008_1_700, or 2008_1_710 exactly.
-
Identify the vulnerable function moduleUse transaction SE37 (Function Builder) to search for function modules within the ST-PI namespace. Look for function modules that handle sensitive data retrieval or user information access. Check transaction SUIM (User Information System) for authorization objects related to ST-PI function modules.Affected if A function module exists in ST-PI that can be called by any authenticated user without proper authorization checks.
-
Verify authorization vulnerability existsUse transaction SU53 immediately after testing to check if a low-privileged user can access function modules they should not have access to. Alternatively, review authorization traces using transaction ST03N or auth trace via transaction SUIM > Authorization Trace.Affected if Authenticated users without elevated privileges can execute function modules that should require elevated or restricted authorizations.
-
Review user access to sensitive dataUse transaction SUIM > Users by Complex Selection Criteria or run reports to compare which users have access to sensitive tables or data via ST-PI function modules. Check transaction S_TABU_DIS for table access restrictions.Affected if Users with standard or limited roles can retrieve data outside their assigned authorization scope through ST-PI function modules.
The environment is affected if SAP Solution Tools Plug-In (ST-PI) version 740, 758, 2008_1_700, or 2008_1_710 is installed and any authenticated user can access function modules or data beyond their intended authorization level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant SAP Security Note to implement proper authorization checks in the affected function module. Conduct thorough access control testing post-patch to verify users can only access data within their authorized scope.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24322 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data