ThinkwiseApplication

CVE-2026-24497

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 23 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in SimTech Systems, Inc. ThinkWise allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects ThinkWise: from 7 through 23.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in SimTech Systems ThinkWise allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input that overflows a buffer on the stack. The vulnerability affects versions 7 through 23 and enables remote code inclusion with critical severity (CVSS 9.8).

MitigationUpgrade ThinkWise to the latest version beyond 23 that includes the security patch, or apply vendor-supplied patches if available. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the ThinkWise application and implement input validation as a temporary compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ThinkwiseApplication
Affected:>= 7, < 23

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm ThinkWise installation
    Locate ThinkWise application components on the system, typically found in the SimTech Systems installation directory. Use system inventory or application listing tools to identify if ThinkWise software is present.
    Affected if ThinkWise is not found on the system, the system is not affected by this vulnerability.
  2. Identify installed ThinkWise version
    Use the application's built-in version information feature, check the About dialog, or inspect version metadata in the installation directory. Common methods include checking the executable properties, a versioninfo file, or running 'thinkwise --version' if a CLI tool exists.
    Affected if Unable to determine the version means the detection is inconclusive.
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Verify the installed version number against the affected range: versions 7 through 22 (anything >= 7 but < 23) are vulnerable. Versions 23 and later are patched.
    Affected if Installed version is 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, or 22, indicating the system is vulnerable.
  4. Assess network exposure of ThinkWise service
    Check if the ThinkWise application is listening on network ports or accessible remotely. Review firewall rules, exposed interfaces, and service bindings to determine if the application accepts remote connections.
    Affected if ThinkWise is network-accessible and running a vulnerable version, the buffer overflow can be triggered by remote attackers.

The environment is affected if ThinkWise is installed with a version numbered 7 through 22 and is network-accessible, allowing remote attackers to trigger the stack-based buffer overflow for code execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 23 or later
Fixed in 23
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ThinkWise to the latest version beyond 23 that includes the security patch, or apply vendor-supplied patches if available. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the ThinkWise application and implement input validation as a temporary compensating control.

Fix this in Thinkwise Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24497 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data