CVE-2026-2456
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 11.3.x <= 11.3.0, 11.2.x <= 11.2.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.10 Mattermost fails to limit the size of responses from integration action endpoints, which allows an authenticated attacker to cause server memory exhaustion and denial of service via a malicious integration server that returns an arbitrarily large response when a user clicks an interactive message button.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00571
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to enforce response size limits on integration action endpoints. An authenticated attacker can set up a malicious integration server that returns an arbitrarily large response when a user clicks an interactive message button, causing server memory exhaustion and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.11>= 11.2.0, < 11.2.3>= 11.3.0, < 11.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Mattermost Server versionRun 'mmctl --version' or check the Mattermost System Console > About page for the exact version numberAffected if Version is >= 10.11.0 and < 10.11.11, OR >= 11.2.0 and < 11.2.3, OR >= 11.3.0 and < 11.3.1
-
Verify integration endpoints are accessibleCheck System Console > Integrations > Integration Management to see if custom integrations are enabled, or query the API endpoint /api/v4/integrations/actionsAffected if Custom integrations or integration actions are enabled and accessible to authenticated users
-
Identify configured integration plugins or webhooksReview System Console > Integrations > Webhooks and System Console > Plugins > Management for any installed integration plugins or outgoing webhooks that connect to external serversAffected if Any integration plugins or outgoing webhooks are configured to communicate with external integration servers
-
Check for unusually high memory usageMonitor server memory consumption via 'top' or 'htop' commands, or check Mattermost logs for out-of-memory errors around integration action requestsAffected if Memory exhaustion is occurring, particularly during interactive message button clicks
The environment is affected if Mattermost Server version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges AND integration action endpoints are accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1111.2.311.3.1
Update Mattermost to the patched version as specified in MMSA-2026-00571. As an interim control, consider implementing response size limits at a reverse proxy or WAF in front of Mattermost.
Upgrade to 10.11.11 (for 10.11.x), 11.2.3 (for 11.2.x), or 11.3.1 (for 11.3.x) depending on your current branch
- 1. Identify your current Mattermost Server version using the system console or mmctl command
- 2. For version 10.11.x: upgrade to version 10.11.11 or later
- 3. For version 11.2.x: upgrade to version 11.2.3 or later
- 4. For version 11.3.x: upgrade to version 11.3.1 or later
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the server version in the system console
- 6. Test interactive message buttons to ensure integration functionality still works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2456 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2456 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data