CVE-2026-24734
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat. When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed. This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected. Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue. Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Tomcat Native's OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) responder implementation fails to perform verification and freshness checks on OCSP responses, allowing potentially revoked certificates to be accepted as valid and bypassing certificate revocation checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.83, < 9.0.115>= 10.1.1, < 10.1.52>= 11.0.1, < 11.0.18= 10.1.0= 11.0.0>= 1.3.0, < 1.3.5>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache Tomcat versionRun the version.sh (Unix) or version.bat (Windows) script in the Tomcat bin directory, or examine the bootstrap JAR files in the lib folderAffected if version is 9.0.83 through 9.0.114, or 10.1.0, or 10.1.1 through 10.1.51, or 11.0.0, or 11.0.1 through 11.0.17 (older than 9.0.115, 10.1.52, or 11.0.18 respectively)
-
Check Apache Tomcat Native versionLocate the native library file: tcnative-1.dll on Windows or libtcnative-1.so on Linux, typically in the Tomcat bin or lib directory, or check the tcnative JAR if packaged separatelyAffected if version is 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, or 2.0.0 through 2.0.11 (older than 1.3.5 or 2.0.12)
-
Determine if OCSP is enabled for certificate validationInspect the server.xml SSL connector configuration for OCSP-related attributes such as ocspEnabled="true" or check for JVM system properties like -Dcom.sun.security.enableOcsp=true, or review the openssl.cnf for OCSP responder configurationAffected if OCSP is explicitly enabled for certificate revocation checking in the connector or via system properties
You are affected if you run a vulnerable combination of Apache Tomcat and Apache Tomcat Native versions AND have OCSP-based certificate revocation checking enabled in your SSL/TLS configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.52.0.129.0.115
Upgrade Apache Tomcat Native to version 1.3.5+/2.0.12+ and Apache Tomcat to 11.0.18+/10.1.52+/9.0.115+ to fix the OCSP validation flaw; alternatively, disable OCSP and use CRL-based certificate revocation.
Tomcat 9.0.115 / 10.1.52 / 11.0.18 or Tomcat Native 1.3.5 / 2.0.12
- Identify whether you are using Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat, or both.
- If using Apache Tomcat Native: Upgrade to version 1.3.5 or later, or 2.0.12 or later.
- If using Apache Tomcat: Upgrade to version 9.0.115 or later (for 9.x), 10.1.52 or later (for 10.1.x), or 11.0.18 or later (for 11.x).
- After upgrading, verify that OCSP validation is working correctly in your environment.
- Test the certificate revocation functionality to ensure the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24734 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24734 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data