CVE-2026-24740
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Prior to version 9.0.3, a flaw in Dozzle’s agent-backed shell endpoints allows a user restricted by label filters (for example, `label=env=dev`) to obtain an interactive root shell in out‑of‑scope containers (for example, `env=prod`) on the same agent host by directly targeting their container IDs. Version 9.0.3 contains a patch for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDozzle versions prior to 9.0.3 have an authorization bypass in agent-backed shell endpoints where label-based access controls can be circumvented by directly targeting container IDs, allowing users restricted to specific label scopes (e.g., env=dev) to obtain interactive root shells on out-of-scope containers (e.g., env=prod) running on the same agent host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dozzle versionCheck the running Dozzle container or binary version using 'dozzle --version' or inspect the Docker container image tagAffected if version is present and less than 9.0.3
-
Verify agent-backed shell feature is enabledInspect Dozzle configuration or environment variables for agent-related settings (e.g., DOZZLE_AGENT_ENABLED, agent endpoints in the UI)Affected if agent-backed shell functionality is enabled in the Dozzle deployment
-
Confirm label-based access controls are configuredCheck Dozzle configuration for label-based authorization rules (e.g., DOZZLE_LABEL_FILTER, env or label-specific access scopes in the config file)Affected if label-based access restrictions are defined to scope users to specific container labels
-
Identify containers with different label scopes on the same agent hostList all containers on the Dozzle agent host and examine their labels (e.g., 'docker ps --format "{{.Names}} {{.Labels}}"')Affected if multiple containers exist with different label values (e.g., env=dev vs env=prod) running on the same host where Dozzle agent is connected
You are affected if Dozzle version is below 9.0.3, agent-backed shell is enabled, label-based access controls are configured, and containers with different label scopes exist on the same agent host.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.3
Upgrade Dozzle to version 9.0.3 or later to patch the authorization bypass. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to agent endpoints and audit container ID access patterns.
9.0.3
- Backup your current Dozzle configuration and data
- Pull the latest Dozzle image: docker pull amir20/dozzle:v9.0.3
- Stop the existing Dozzle container: docker stop <dozzle-container-id>
- Remove the old Dozzle container: docker rm <dozzle-container-id>
- Run a new Dozzle container with the same configuration but using the new image version 9.0.3
- Verify Dozzle starts successfully and the version is correct
- Test that the label filter restrictions are properly enforced
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24740 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24740 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data