CVE-2026-24762
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. From versions alpha.13 to alpha.81, RustFS logs sensitive credential material (access key, secret key, session token) to application logs at INFO level. This results in credentials being recorded in plaintext in log output, which may be accessible to internal or external log consumers and could lead to compromise of sensitive credentials. This issue has been patched in version alpha.82.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRustFS versions alpha.13 through alpha.81 log sensitive credential material (access keys, secret keys, session tokens) at INFO level, resulting in plaintext credentials being written to application logs accessible to log consumers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify RustFS versionCheck the installed RustFS version in your project via Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, or by running 'cargo list' if it's a dependency. Alternatively, check the binary or library version if RustFS is packaged separately.Affected if Version is alpha.13, alpha.14, alpha.15, alpha.16, alpha.17, alpha.18, alpha.19, alpha.20, alpha.21, alpha.22, alpha.23, alpha.24, alpha.25, alpha.26, alpha.27, alpha.28, alpha.29, alpha.30, alpha.31, alpha.32, alpha.33, alpha.34, alpha.35, alpha.36, alpha.37, alpha.38, alpha.39, alpha.40, alpha.41,
-
Confirm logging is enabledVerify that your application or the RustFS library has logging configured at INFO level or higher (INFO, WARN, ERROR, or TRACE). Check your logging configuration files, environment variables (such as RUST_LOG), or code initialization that sets log levels.Affected if Logging is enabled at INFO level or higher and the vulnerable RustFS version is in use
-
Check if credentials are configuredInspect your application configuration, environment variables, or code where RustFS is initialized to determine if access keys, secret keys, or session tokens are being passed to RustFS for authentication.Affected if Credentials (access keys, secret keys, or session tokens) are configured for use with RustFS
-
Inspect logs for exposed credentialsSearch your application log files or log aggregation system for any plaintext instances of your access keys, secret keys, or session tokens that may have been logged by RustFS operations.Affected if Plaintext credentials appear in logs and the vulnerable version is deployed
Your environment is affected if RustFS version alpha.13 through alpha.81 is installed, logging is enabled at INFO level or higher, and credentials are configured for RustFS, resulting in potential credential exposure in logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade RustFS to version alpha.82 or later, audit existing logs for exposed credentials, and rotate any credentials that may have been logged.
alpha.82
- Identify the current RustFS version in use (check Cargo.toml or dependency lock file)
- Update RustFS dependency to version alpha.82 in Cargo.toml or equivalent dependency management file
- Run cargo update or equivalent to fetch the new version
- Rebuild the project to incorporate the patched version
- Verify the version upgrade was successful by checking the installed RustFS version
- Review application logs to confirm credentials are no longer being logged at INFO level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24762 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24762 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data