CVE-2026-24823
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in FASTSHIFT X-TRACK (Software/X-Track/USER/App/Utils/lv_img_png/PNGdec/src modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files inflate.C. This issue affects X-TRACK: through v2.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA classic buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PNG decoding library (PNGdec) within X-TRACK's inflate.C file. The vulnerability stems from the inflate.c module performing buffer copies without validating input sizes, allowing an out-of-bounds write that could enable arbitrary code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- Y
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- N
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Red
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm X-TRACK installationIdentify if FASTSHIFT X-TRACK software is present on the system by checking for the application or its componentsAffected if X-TRACK is installed on the system
-
Determine X-TRACK versionLocate and read the version information for the installed X-TRACK instance (check application metadata, version file, or about dialog)Affected if The installed version is v2.7 or any earlier version (v2.6, v2.5, etc.)
-
Identify PNG decoding usageDetermine whether the PNGdec module or PNG decoding functionality is actively used by the X-TRACK installationAffected if PNG decoding is enabled or utilized in the environment
-
Check for untrusted PNG processingAudit configurations or usage patterns to determine if the system processes PNG files from untrusted or external sourcesAffected if The system processes PNG files from untrusted sources
A user is affected if FASTSHACK X-TRACK v2.7 or earlier is installed and its PNGdec module processes PNG files, since the buffer overflow in inflate.C only triggers during PNG decompression of crafted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade X-TRACK beyond v2.7 to obtain a patched PNGdec library with proper bounds checking, or apply source-level fixes to inflate.C to validate buffer sizes before memory copy operations.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24823 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24823 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data