CVE-2026-24976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in NooTheme Organici Library noo-organici-library allows Object Injection.This issue affects Organici Library: from n/a through <= 2.1.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the NooTheme Organici Library (noo-organici-library) allows attackers to inject PHP objects via insecure deserialization, potentially leading to remote code execution or other attacks. This affects all versions up to and including 2.1.2.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the noo-organici-library in your codebaseSearch your project for files or directories named 'organici', 'noo-organici-library', or containing 'nootheme' in combination with 'organici'. Check your dependency management files (composer.json, package.json, or similar) for 'noo-organici-library' or 'nootheme/organici-library' as a dependency.Affected if The library is present in your project dependencies or file structure.
-
Identify the installed version of the Organici LibraryCheck your lock files (composer.lock, package-lock.json) or the library's main PHP file for a version declaration. If the library is included as a submodule or direct upload, inspect the main library file for a version constant or readme file.Affected if The version is 2.1.2 or lower, or if no version can be determined but the library is present.
-
Inspect deserialization operations in the library codeSearch the library directory for PHP unserialize() function calls. Review any code that processes serialized data, particularly data originating from user input, HTTP requests, or external sources.Affected if The library contains unserialize() calls that handle data from untrusted sources without prior sanitization.
-
Determine if the library is actively processing external dataReview your application code that integrates the Organici Library to see if any functions that handle serialized data are being invoked during normal operation or through user-controlled inputs.Affected if The vulnerable deserialization functions are reachable and process data that could be controlled by an attacker.
You are affected if the noo-organici-library (version 2.1.2 or lower) is present in your environment AND its deserialization functions are processing untrusted data without validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Organici Library to a patched version if available, or review and sanitize all deserialization operations in the library code to ensure only trusted data is processed. If the library is no longer maintained, consider replacing it with a secure alternative.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data