CVE-2026-25019
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Vito Peleg Atarim atarim-visual-collaboration allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Atarim: from n/a through <= 4.3.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a missing authorization vulnerability in the Atarim visual collaboration plugin that allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to collaboration features or data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Atarim plugin presenceLocate the Atarim visual collaboration plugin in your CMS, website, or application plugin directory. Check your installed plugins list or examine the codebase for Atarim-related files and modules.Affected if The Atarim plugin is installed and active in the environment
-
Inspect access control security level configurationAccess the Atarim plugin settings or configuration file. Look for security level, access control, or permission-related settings that control who can access collaboration features.Affected if Access control security levels are set to a permissive or incorrect configuration that allows unauthenticated or unauthorized access
-
Verify authorization enforcement on collaboration endpointsExamine the Atarim plugin's API endpoints or collaboration feature URLs. Test whether these endpoints require valid authentication and authorization before granting access to sensitive data or collaboration tools.Affected if Collaboration features or data are accessible without proper authorization checks being enforced
-
Review user role and permission mappingsCheck the Atarim plugin's role-based access control (RBAC) mappings. Determine whether all user roles are properly mapped to appropriate permission levels for visual collaboration features.Affected if User roles are misconfigured or permission mappings allow unauthorized users to access privileged collaboration functions
You are affected if the Atarim plugin is installed with incorrectly configured access control security levels that permit unauthorized access to collaboration features or data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks and enforce correct access control security levels in the Atarim plugin to ensure all sensitive operations require appropriate authentication and authorization.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25019 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data