CVE-2026-25053
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0, vulnerabilities in the Git node allowed authenticated users with permission to create or modify workflows to execute arbitrary system commands or read arbitrary files on the n8n host. This issue has been patched in versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Git node in n8n workflow automation platform versions prior to 1.123.10 and 2.5.0 contains vulnerabilities allowing authenticated users with workflow create/modify permissions to execute arbitrary system commands or read arbitrary files on the host through command injection and path traversal in the Git node.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.123.0>= 2.0.0, < 2.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your n8n versionAccess the n8n UI and navigate to Settings > About to view the installed version, or check the version via your deployment method (docker image tag, package.json, or CLI if availableAffected if The version is less than 1.123.0, or greater than or equal to 2.0.0 but less than 2.5.0
-
Locate workflows using the Git nodeSearch your workflow storage (database or filesystem depending on your setup) for workflows that include the Git node, or review workflows in the UI for any using the Git nodeAffected if You have active workflows that utilize the Git node functionality
-
Review user permissions for workflow creation and modificationCheck your n8n user management settings to see which users or roles have workflow create or modify permissionsAffected if There are users other than administrators with workflow create or modify permissions who could access the Git node
-
Inspect Git node configurations in useFor workflows using the Git node, examine the node configuration parameters such as repository URL, branch, commands, and any fields that accept user input that could be manipulatedAffected if Git node configurations accept dynamic input that could potentially be exploited for command injection or path traversal
You are affected if your n8n version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you have workflows using the Git node accessible to users with workflow create/modify permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.123.02.5.0
Upgrade n8n to version 1.123.10 or 2.5.0. Review and audit workflows using the Git node for any signs of exploitation, and limit Git node permissions to only trusted users until patched.
Upgrade to n8n version 1.123.10 (if on 1.x branch) or version 2.5.0 (if on 2.x branch)
- 1. Back up your current n8n instance, including workflows, credentials, and configuration
- 2. Identify your current n8n version using `n8n --version` or your deployment method
- 3. If running version 1.x: Upgrade to version 1.123.10 or later
- 4. If running version 2.x: Upgrade to version 2.5.0 or later
- 5. For Docker: Update your image tag to `n8nio/n8n:1.123.10` or `n8nio/n8n:2.5.0` and recreate the container
- 6. For npm: Run `npm install -g [email protected]` or `npm install -g [email protected]`
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the n8n version
- 8. Review and test workflows that use the Git node to ensure functionality is intact
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25053 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data