CVE-2026-25070
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedXikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands through the destIp parameter to achieve remote code execution with root privileges on the network switch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior have an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet endpoint. The destIp parameter used in ping testing functionality does not properly sanitize user input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary operating system commands. Successful exploitation grants remote code execution with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.04.b07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device web interface or use network discovery to confirm the device is an XikeStor SKS8310-8X or Seekswan Zikestor SKS8310-8X Network SwitchAffected if The device model matches SKS8310-8X
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the device web interface or check via SNMP and locate the firmware version information. Compare it to the affected version 1.04.B07Affected if The firmware version is 1.04.B07 or prior
-
Verify the PingTestSet endpoint existsAttempt to access the URL path /goform/PingTestSet on the device (e.g., http://<device-ip>/goform/PingTestSet)Affected if The endpoint responds with any HTTP status code (indicating the web service is available)
-
Confirm Ping functionality is enabledCheck the device web interface for Ping Test or similar network diagnostic features under the administration or maintenance settingsAffected if The PingTestSet feature is listed as available or enabled in the device configuration
The device is affected if it is an XikeStor SKS8310-8X or Seekswan Zikestor SKS8310-8X running firmware version 1.04.B07 or prior, and the /goform/PingTestSet web endpoint is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware update when available; if no patch exists, restrict management interface access to trusted networks only, disable the PingTestSet functionality if possible, and implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25070 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25070 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data