CVE-2026-25111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the restore route.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXWEB Pro versions 1.12.1 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the restore functionality. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious operating system commands through input fields in restore route requests, achieving remote code execution on the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.12.1<= 1.12.1<= 1.12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the XWEB Pro product variantAccess the device web interface and locate the system information or about page. Look for the specific model designation (Xweb 500b Pro, Xweb 300d Pro, or Xweb 500d Pro) displayed in the interface header, footer, or status/summary page.Affected if The product is any of the three listed variants (500b Pro, 300d Pro, or 500d Pro)
-
Check the installed firmware versionIn the device web interface, navigate to the system information, status, or firmware version page. Record the exact firmware version number displayed.Affected if The firmware version is 1.12.1 or any version lower than 1.12.1
-
Verify if restore functionality is accessibleAttempt to access the restore feature endpoint in the web interface. This is typically found under a restore, backup/restore, system restore, or configuration restore menu item. Check if the route loads or responds.Affected if The restore functionality is present and accessible in the web interface
-
Confirm authentication is required for restoreTry to access the restore functionality without logging in, or verify in the authentication settings that the restore feature requires valid user credentials.Affected if Authentication is not enforced or uses weak/default credentials, making unauthorized restore access possible
A user is affected if they are running any of the three XWEB Pro variants with firmware version 1.12.1 or lower and the restore functionality is accessible (with or without proper authentication).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a version newer than 1.12.1 that addresses this vulnerability; if an update is unavailable, disable or restrict access to the restore functionality and implement strict input validation/sanitization on all user-supplied parameters before they reach system command execution functions.
Contact vendor for fixed firmware version (likely > 1.12.1)
- 1. Identify the specific Xweb Pro model (500b, 300d, or 500d) currently deployed in the environment
- 2. Check the current firmware version installed on the device
- 3. Contact the device vendor (Copeland) to obtain the firmware version that addresses CVE-2026-25111
- 4. Download the updated firmware from an official vendor source
- 5. Review vendor release notes for any special upgrade instructions or prerequisites
- 6. Back up current device configuration before initiating firmware update
- 7. Apply the firmware update via the device's management interface
- 8. Verify the update was successful and the device is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data