CVE-2026-25184
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) where improper synchronization in concurrent execution allows an authenticated local attacker to escalate privileges. This kernel-mode driver flaw enables manipulation of shared resources to achieve privilege elevation from a lower-privileged account to elevated system or administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.22631.6936< 10.0.26100.8246< 10.0.26200.8246< 10.0.28000.1836< 10.0.25398.2274< 10.0.26100.32690CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows build number, then compare to the vulnerable version thresholds: 23h2 requires <22631.6936, 24h2 requires <26100.8246, 25h2 requires <26200.8246, 26h1 requires <28000.1836, Server 2022 23h2 requires <25398.2274, Server 2025 requires <26100.32690Affected if The installed Windows build number falls below the specified threshold for the corresponding version branch
-
Verify applockerfltr.sys driver presenceCheck if the driver file exists at C:\Windows\System32\drivers\applockerfltr.sys or query loaded drivers using 'driverquery /v | findstr applockerfltr'Affected if The applockerfltr.sys driver file exists on the system
-
Confirm Applocker policy is enabledRun 'Get-AppLockerPolicy -Effective' in PowerShell with admin privileges, or check Group Policy at Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Application Control Policies\ApplockerAffected if Applocker policy is configured and enabled, which loads the vulnerable driver into kernel mode
The system is affected if it runs a Windows version below the specified threshold AND has the applockerfltr.sys driver loaded via enabled Applocker policy, allowing an authenticated local attacker to exploit the race condition for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.22631.693610.0.25398.227410.0.26100.8246
Apply the vendor-supplied patch for applockerfltr.sys when available. Until then, limit local administrative access, monitor for suspicious process activity, and consider disabling Applocker policy if non-essential to reduce the attack surface.
Windows 11 23h2 build 10.0.22631.6936+, Windows 11 24h2 build 10.0.26100.8246+, Windows 11 25h2 build 10.0.26200.8246+, Windows 11 26h1 build 10.0.28000.1836+, Windows Server 2022 23h2 build 10.0.25398.2274+, Windows Server 2025 build 10.0.26100.32690+
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows version (23h2, 24h2, 25h2, 26h1) and build number corresponds to your system
- For Windows 11 23h2: upgrade to build 10.0.22631.6936 or later
- For Windows 11 24h2: upgrade to build 10.0.26100.8246 or later
- For Windows 11 25h2: upgrade to build 10.0.26200.8246 or later
- For Windows 11 26h1: upgrade to build 10.0.28000.1836 or later
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: upgrade to build 10.0.25398.2274 or later
- For Windows Server 2025: upgrade to build 10.0.26100.32690 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25184 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25184 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data