CVE-2026-25188
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Telephony Service allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over an adjacent network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Windows Telephony Service enables an unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access to achieve privilege escalation. The flaw allows overflow of heap-allocated memory, potentially permitting arbitrary code execution with elevated system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8957< 10.0.17763.8511< 10.0.19044.7058< 10.0.19045.7058< 10.0.22631.6783< 10.0.26100.7979< 10.0.26200.7979< 10.0.28000.1719CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to view the full build number (e.g., 10.0.19045.7058)Affected if The build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.8957, 17763.8511, 19044.7058, 19045.7058, 22631.6783, 26100.7979, 26200.7979, or 28000.1719 depending on your Windows release
-
Verify Telephony Service statusOpen PowerShell and run 'Get-Service -Name "TapiSrv" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue' or 'sc query TapiSrv' to check if the Windows Telephony Service is installed and runningAffected if The service state shows as Running and your Windows build is below the fixed versions listed above
-
Confirm Windows release versionRun 'winver' to identify if you are on Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or Windows 11 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, or 26h1, then cross-reference with the affected build ranges provided in the CVEAffected if Your specific Windows release matches one of the affected versions AND your installed build is lower than the corresponding fixed build for that release
You are affected if your Windows build version is below the threshold for your specific Windows release AND the Telephony Service (TapiSrv) is present and enabled on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.895710.0.17763.851110.0.19044.7058
Apply Microsoft security patches for Windows Telephony Service when available; restrict network access to affected systems via network segmentation to limit adjacent network attack surface.
Upgrade to Windows 10 build 10.0.14393.8957 or later (1607), 10.0.17763.8511 or later (1809), 10.0.19044.7058 or later (21h2), 10.0.19045.7058 or later (22h2); or Windows 11 build 10.0.22631.6783 or later (23h2), 10.0.26100.7979 or later (24h2), 10.0.26200.7979 or later (25h2), 10.0.28000.1719 or la
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt
- Determine the applicable Windows release (e.g., Windows 10 1809, Windows 11 23h2) from the version number
- For Windows 10: Navigate to Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update and install all available updates
- For Windows 11: Navigate to Settings > Windows Update and install all available updates
- Alternatively, manually download and install the specific security update for your Windows version from the Microsoft Update Catalog (search for the CVE KB number)
- After installation, restart the system to apply the security update
- Verify the installation by checking that the Windows version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25188 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25188 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data