CVE-2026-25199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInstances deployed via the Proxmox extension allow unauthorized access to instances belonging to other tenants. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.0.0. The Proxmox extension for CloudStack improperly uses a user-editable instance setting, proxmox_vmid, to associate CloudStack instances with Proxmox virtual machines. Because this value is not restricted or validated against tenant ownership and Proxmox VM IDs are predictable, a non-privileged attacker can modify the setting to reference a VM belonging to another account. This allows unauthorized cross-tenant access and enables full control over the targeted VM, including starting, stopping, and destroying the virtual machine. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0.1, which fixes this issue. As a workaround for the existing installations, editing of the proxmox_vmid instance detail by users can be prevented by adding this detail name to the global configuration parameter - user.vm.denied.details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Proxmox extension for Apache CloudStack fails to validate that the user-editable proxmox_vmid instance detail belongs to the caller's tenant before associating it with a Proxmox VM. Since Proxmox VM IDs are predictable and this setting is not restricted, an attacker in one tenant can modify their VM's proxmox_vmid to point at another tenant's Proxmox VM, achieving unauthorized cross-tenant access and full control (start, stop, destroy).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.21.0.0, < 4.22.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache CloudStack versionRetrieve the installed CloudStack version from the management server (commonly via the UI or API command 'listConfigs' with name='cloudstack.version' or similar version query command)Affected if The installed version is >= 4.21.0.0 and < 4.22.0.1
-
Confirm Proxmox extension is deployedCheck if the Proxmox integration is enabled in CloudStack (look for Proxmox-related hosts, cluster configurations, or the presence of the Proxmox resource/segment in the cloud setup)Affected if Proxmox hypervisor clusters or hosts are configured in the CloudStack environment
-
Verify user editability of proxmox_vmidCheck the global configuration setting 'user.vm.denied.details' or inspect whether users can edit the proxmox_vmid instance detail on their VMs via API or UIAffected if The proxmox_vmid field is NOT listed in user.vm.denied.details, meaning users can modify this instance detail
-
Check for cross-tenant VM associationsReview VM instance details for any proxmox_vmid values that map to VMs outside the owning tenant, or examine API audit logs for unexpected VM operations on foreign tenant resourcesAffected if Any VM instance has a proxmox_vmid pointing to a Proxmox VM ID belonging to a different tenant
You are affected if running CloudStack 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.0.0 with the Proxmox extension enabled and the proxmox_vmid detail is user-editable (not blocked by user.vm.denied.details configuration).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.22.0.1
Upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.22.0.1, or alternatively add 'proxmox_vmid' to the user.vm.denied.details global configuration to prevent users from editing this field.
4.22.0.1
- 1. Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the CloudStack management server upgrade.
- 2. Back up the CloudStack database and configuration files before proceeding.
- 3. Stop the CloudStack management server service.
- 4. Upgrade Apache CloudStack to version 4.22.0.1 or later.
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the management server logs.
- 6. Restart the CloudStack management server service.
- 7. Validate that the Proxmox extension functions correctly with the new version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data